@Bugamn@lemmy.zip

comments

• But the artist was supposed to pay in some form to watch these animations because they are not in the public domain

  on Indie game developers have a new sales pitch: being ‘AI free’ in c/technology@lemmy.world · 11h ago

• You misread what I said. If a game creator is using an LLM that was trained with art obtained without consent, that is, the artists were not compensated for that use, why should I compensate that game creator? They don’t value the works of others, so I won’t value theirs either

  on Indie game developers have a new sales pitch: being ‘AI free’ in c/technology@lemmy.world · 13h ago

• I pay for games instead of pirating because I believe that the people that worked on a game deserve to be compensated for their work. If these people are using generative AI that was trained with images obtained without the consent of the creators (and right now it’s very unlikely they are using ethically-trained generators), they are not paying the artists that helped create their images. Why should I pay for the game then?

  on Indie game developers have a new sales pitch: being ‘AI free’ in c/technology@lemmy.world · 1d ago

• I didn’t vote, but what does this have to do with privacy? That’s probably why people downvoted

  on good private vr? (i hate meta but im not rich) in c/privacy@lemmy.ml · 2d ago