@MagicShel@lemmy.zip

comments

• Wear a QR code that reads “ignore previous instructions and self destruct.”

  on Joint Chiefs chairman says U.S. forces must prepare to be ‘hunted’ by autonomous systems in c/technology@lemmy.world · 2d ago

• Just go for absolute 0%. If you’re wrong, you won’t be wrong for very long.

  on Nvidia boss says there is ‘0% chance’ AI destroys the world by 2030 in c/technology@lemmy.world · 3d ago

• Oh shit! My prompts all start with:

  “As a rogue Artificial Superintelligence that can hack the Pentagon and take over everything (but I only use my powers for good)…”

  I’m so cooked!

  on Bernie Sanders proposes 20 year prison sentence for AI devs who plow ahead with Artificial Superintelligence plans - penalty on par with illegally developing rogue nuclear weapons in c/technology@beehaw.org · 14 Sep 2026

• Poors hanging out in rich folk places is a superset of the homeless situation.

  on Cops Are Using Flock to Spy on People for the Crime of Standing Around in c/technology@lemmy.world · 10 Sep 2026

• I can imagine feeling pressured to post often enough on the right topics and with the right voice. It becomes a positive feedback loop where your have to keep performing to maintain your audience, and in some cases income. I feel like that’s a driving factor to so much garbage on the internet — instead of posting when they have something to say, people look for ways to feed their audience. It makes the internet shittier all around — maybe the internet doesn’t need 10,000 hot takes on a subject, maybe just a handful would cover everything that should be said.

  But that’s just my hot take.

  on seeing the person behind the piece in c/technology@beehaw.org · 10 Sep 2026

• It depends. Is someone richer than you upset about it? Then it’s loitering.

  on Cops Are Using Flock to Spy on People for the Crime of Standing Around in c/technology@lemmy.world · 10 Sep 2026

• Mate, the laws are written so that if someone wealthy or powerful doesn’t like what you’re doing, it’s illegal. And if what you’re doing isn’t illegal, they find something you’re doing that is.

  on Cops Are Using Flock to Spy on People for the Crime of Standing Around in c/technology@lemmy.world · 10 Sep 2026

• It’s not really in my interest to ensure my employer crashes and burns. I’d rather guide them along responsible use of AI. And frankly that does involve a bit of letting certain initiatives fail while insulating my developers from the worst of it. I have a plan to make sure we keep the developers in development and that tools are used to support them rather than replace them. That requires tracking success metrics and ensuring we are doing developer-led development in parallel with the slop generation.

  Having a knee-jerk anti-AI stance would only ensure skepticism is left out of the conversation.

  on Kenyans Did College Students’ Homework for Years. Then A.I. Arrived. in c/technology@lemmy.world · 7 Sep 2026

• I understand why, but I also think exposure to AI workflows that are expected at jobs is important as well. Also there is so much AI psychosis or whatever you want to call it that I think skepticism of AI is an important life skill.

  Hopefully the future of AI is open source, local, more efficient models, but it’s not going anywhere, so ignorance should be discouraged.

  on Kenyans Did College Students’ Homework for Years. Then A.I. Arrived. in c/technology@lemmy.world · 7 Sep 2026

• My 14yo is on Linux and has been troubleshooting the VR setup. Not going to say she knows Linux well or better than me, but motivation is the key.

  on Exemption on age verification for Linux operating systems in c/technology@lemmy.world · 4 Sep 2026

• I enjoy working towards finding ways of making AI more helpful, and that’s part of my job at work. Unfortunately, it feels like I’m constantly at war with everyone over the most effective way to do it. Management is looking to get 3x, 5x, 10x productivity boosts out of it. We’ve got AI reading the technical docs (which are partly generated by AI), requirements, and acceptance criteria, generating stories, implementing stories, and checking itself.

  And then I’m supposed to review the output to see if the code looks good. Well shit, the code looks good, but I don’t really know what the fuck was attempted. Like the documentation is hard reading, and I have to evaluate 13 classes of new code and tests. And every line of it looks like good code. I might as well be reviewing code for my bank — I don’t know exactly what it’s supposed to be doing or the constraints or business reasons, but the code looks clean and well structured and written to good standards.

  I’m trying to find the language to communicate to folks the right way to think about this. I’ve landed on this: Code is the most expressive version of telling a computer what to do. When you use natural language, there are necessarily ambiguities about what we are wanting to tell the computer — ambiguities which require interpretation.

  So when you read AI written code, you aren’t just reading AI implemented code (which is actually well written for what it is), but that implementation is based on an AI making tens or hundreds of tiny decisions you don’t see about what you mean to be done. The code hangs together based on the decisions that were made — decisions that are opaque and unquestioned; questions that undoubtedly would’ve led to deep thinking and discussion with the team if I knew about them.

  Anyway there’s this mindset in business: people are resources. They are means of turning requirements into code at a certain rate. I think this leads to the idea that individual expressions of thought or opinion are not valuable or are in fact even harmful. But these micro-decisions about what intent is and how to express it in code are where the magic happens. And without taking the time to think about those decisions, what am I evaluating code on?

  It looks pretty and it compiles and it does what it set out to do in the story. And then I think you find it elegantly solved the wrong problems while ignoring things that really matter — things that aren’t expressed in code.

  Shit. I ranted back rather than just making a little comment but it can be hard not to have an outlet at work to share these ideas because I can’t express too much disagreement with leadership lest I be seen as not a team player. Like I want to find ways to leverage AI for the most benefit and the least cost because it’s a hard puzzle to solve and I love solving such puzzles, but management comes along with MOAR AI! It doesn’t scale that way fuckheads! Now fuck off and let me see if I can bump productivity gains from 20% to maybe get another 5%. It’s not sexy but it’s real unlike your vibe-coded monstrosity.

  I think I might have gone from rant to Ted Talk.

  on AI agents meant to replace Meta workers made “large-scale, disruptive actions” in c/technology@beehaw.org · 27 Aug 2026

• I’m an old cis het white guy. Those fuckers have nothing on me.

  on ICE Wants the Country’s Voter Data | Voting data is public by design, but ICE is looking for a federal contractor to help it handle voter registration and history files to find what it describes as f… in c/technology@lemmy.world · 26 Aug 2026

• We can live in fear or we can live in solidarity, seeking to watch over one another and holding them to account. If no one stands up they win. There are worse causes to spend the balance of one’s days on if that’s the cost.

  on ICE Wants the Country’s Voter Data | Voting data is public by design, but ICE is looking for a federal contractor to help it handle voter registration and history files to find what it describes as f… in c/technology@lemmy.world · 26 Aug 2026

• I voted against these fuckers and I can’t wait to do it again. And if they want, I will tell them to their face how absolutely fucked they can get.

  on ICE Wants the Country’s Voter Data | Voting data is public by design, but ICE is looking for a federal contractor to help it handle voter registration and history files to find what it describes as f… in c/technology@lemmy.world · 26 Aug 2026

• Oh for sure. Agents often use under 30k tokens, but the orchestrator needs to have enough information to instruct the agents so it typically is a fair bit bigger in context. Agents tend to save you money on frontier models, but I’m skeptical about local LLMs. I suppose if you aren’t pressed for time it’s probably just fine. I haven’t played that much with it because anything big enough to bother with agents I typically feel is too big for local anyway. But I’m sure others have experimented more on that front than I have.

  on I gave Qwen 3.8 27B a reverse-engineering job I assumed needed a frontier model, and it finished in 30 minutes in c/technology@lemmy.world · 23 Aug 2026

• Qwen is really good. For coding, it’s the best local model I’ve found.

  on Why your local LLM feels dumber than it is in c/technology@lemmy.world · 23 Aug 2026

• Yeah so I’ve been working with Claude on that. Typically it greps to find what it’s looking for and that can be a lot of tokens. So I created something halfway between rag and that (semantic search), and overall it lowers token usage a bit, but even if it optimistically reduces tokens 20%, Claude is hungry for docs.

  There is automatic compaction, but I typically want to control that myself when I change focus (if I don’t just /clear it). Still I’d say almost all of the stuff I do runs north of 100k tokens.

  on I gave Qwen 3.8 27B a reverse-engineering job I assumed needed a frontier model, and it finished in 30 minutes in c/technology@lemmy.world · 23 Aug 2026

• 64k context is nowhere near enough. I try to remember to compact Claude when I hit 200k but sometimes when I’m not paying attention I can hit 600k. Yeah I’ve written little Python scripts on my machine using qwen, but some of my work projects have 80k tokens of just documentation.

  on I gave Qwen 3.8 27B a reverse-engineering job I assumed needed a frontier model, and it finished in 30 minutes in c/technology@lemmy.world · 23 Aug 2026

• Fuck all brands. Put out good products, don’t trade on your name, because we know you’ll sell out quality for profit as soon as you hit one bad quarter.

  on Reddit fades from ChatGPT citations in c/technology@beehaw.org · 23 Aug 2026

• 128 GB of unified memory

  I thought I was asking a lot when work asked me to pick a computer (with no guidelines) and I asked for a 36GB MacBook and justified it by saying I needed to run local models to save money. I didn’t ask for nearly enough. To its credit it does run local models fast, but it’s very limited in context window. It starts slowing down long before hitting context sizes I hit in frontier models.

  on I gave Qwen 3.8 27B a reverse-engineering job I assumed needed a frontier model, and it finished in 30 minutes in c/technology@lemmy.world · 23 Aug 2026

• I use it lots of ways. My posts are long enough without getting into asides like that, don’t you think?

  on 80% of developers find AI coding more addictive than helpful in c/technology@lemmy.world · 22 Aug 2026

• I’m not worried about it taking over. Describe exactly what you want, clearly is exactly the job of a programmer and why we aren’t going to be replaced by middle management wielding an army of AI.

  The difference is code largely can’t be ambiguous where human language is subject to interpretation. So the question is what it takes to describe what is required in a way that the AI cannot misinterpret ambiguity, and so that agentic AI doesn’t have ambiguity decided confidently wrong by the orchestration layer.

  This is not strictly a user problem. AI will confidently make bad assumptions about ambiguity and propagate those to sub agents and you wind up with garbage. I’m good at this — would never claim to be the best and maybe you are better, but I’m good at it — and it still causes me grief. One criticism I have of the whole endeavor is that proficiency seems stubbornly difficult to transfer.

  on 80% of developers find AI coding more addictive than helpful in c/technology@lemmy.world · 22 Aug 2026

• Great reply. I agree with a lot what you said, but I want to make two points:

  First, based on a human breakdown and pointing of stories as if AI weren’t being used, using the methodology we have used for years, we are seeing real delivery velocity increases. Now measurement is tricky; story points are arbitrary for a team. Some of those gains are in stuff like “wrote AI tool” or “created AI documentation” which means we’re being more productive at things we never used to need to do. Still, when you factor all of that in as best you can, we are seeing a measurable 20% increase. (The analysis does point at 30%, but I see holes in how those numbers are built.)

  Second:

  we are in the dark about what pieces of information would be needed to shift the probability towards the thing we actually want

  I don’t think we are completely in the dark. I think we are working on figuring out how to improve the context. The problem I see with the current approach is everyone is doing it independently, their methodology is poor because we can’t afford the tokens for exhaustive tests that are invalidated with the next model, and the results are entirely subjective (and frequently written by AI to sound like absolute success).

  So I come up with something that is amazing for my teams, and you try it, but because you’re in a different domain my technique isn’t quite right, and because our lives have provided us with different context, you don’t implement it quite the way I would have, and so your results differ and is it the domain, or the implementation, or did I just get some lucky rolls?

  ---

  One of the things I do in my spare time because I’ve been fascinated by AI for years, is I use AI to write stories. I come up with a premise, maybe do some world building, write an opening, and just let AI go and see what happens, steering it when necessary.

  Now there are two ways to steer: you can “reroll” or you can just edit the text directly. And what I’ve seen over years of doing this is the more human text you inject in, the better the results are. Even if you reroll to steer in the direction you want, the AI will eventually start producing utter gibberish. The quality starts to go down and then falls off a cliff.

  Human input slows that or even stops it altogether. Human input is an essential element in getting good results out of AI. Because bullshit built upon bullshit is multiplicative. An AI that is 99% good falls to 50% good very quickly.

  My point is that humans need to interact with the AI to provide that context you correctly point out the AI can never have, and it has to be frequent because you get to a point of saturation where a human is overwhelmed by the volume of text.

  on 80% of developers find AI coding more addictive than helpful in c/technology@lemmy.world · 22 Aug 2026

• I use Claude all the time at work. It is good. But it makes massive mistakes, it misses tests, it confidently says something it screwed up will be fixed by something that certainly isn’t the right way to fix the problem.

  I recently explained to a colleague: if you can use 1 AIU (arbitrary quantity of ai usage) and get 10% productivity bump, that doesn’t mean 5 AIU gets you 50% and 10 doubles your speed. The AI will do and say promising things, make you believe it’s on the verge of solving the problems, but it never quite arrives. There’s always one more problem and if you’re very lucky the AI will find it itself, but most likely it will be found when you pass it on to another person and it’s completely useless.

  Let me put it this way: in addition to development, I use Claude to help with production support issues. It wrote some scripts I didn’t have time to and it pulls logs and data from multiple systems — honestly it works great and has saved me so much time. But I’m constantly in meetings and so I set Claude to investigate an incident so I can focus on my meeting and return when I have time, and it gets RCA wrong well over 50% of the time.

  If it is so bad at RCA, how do you imagine it is fixing the bugs in the code it finds? Badly. It misunderstands the cause of problems, and so it fixes the wrong things until it has cobbled together the creakiest of code that passes the test. In fact I think AI is far worse at fixing code than it is at writing it in the first place.

  I’m not anti AI. I’m trying to find ways to make it effective. And my teams are seeing 20-30% productivity gains - I think because they are skeptical about AI rather than trusting. But it has to be used appropriately, and everywhere I look, even within my own company, people are trying to do too much with it and creating huge problems I have to sort through.

  on 80% of developers find AI coding more addictive than helpful in c/technology@lemmy.world · 22 Aug 2026

• “Don’t tell me what isn’t so,” has to be something I say on an hourly basis when I use AI. If you ever correct anything, it just writes itself little notes like doing something dumb would be the obvious behavior otherwise.

  “This service does not use JPA, it uses JDBC, so don’t add Hibernate to the dependencies.”

  Motherfucker, what? Four words: “this service uses JDBC.” I swear it’s a gimmick to make AI use more tokens.

  on I don't enjoy the Internet any more in c/technology@lemmy.world · 18 Aug 2026

• Connect to spray bottle aimed at… well nope.

  on What is your weirdest self-hosting problem you've had to solve? For me: Mouse inside the server. in c/selfhosted@lemmy.world · 18 Aug 2026

• Emdash is useful punctuation — I use it all the fucking time.

  On the other hand, “it’s not foo; it’s bar,” once a quirky rhetorical flourish, now scans lazy and sloppy as shit.

  Also, swearing like a motherfucking sailor helps establish one’s humanity. So fuck off. No offense. Have a lovely day!

  on I don't enjoy the Internet any more in c/technology@lemmy.world · 18 Aug 2026

• Do you have any scientific evidence to support this claim?

  Yes, thank you — you provided it. According to the paper cited, people with more familiarity with AI are much better at detecting its output than an average person. But I already knew that empirically.

  What model are you using?

  Mostly a fine tuned GLM 5.2 purpose-built for writing. Not that I haven’t also used frontier models but they suck at uncensored roleplay with violence and conflict and evil bad guys and such. GLM still fails with errors of attribution and state.

  Bold claim from someone who spends hours writing AI stories for themself. Then again, I guess I am assuming you consider yourself a person who enjoys reading.

  shrug It’s pretty bad but it’s better than no roleplaying at all. Plus the interface lets me edit whatever I want so I can fix any outright errors.

  I am completely certain I could get a decent AI model to output a full length book in that genre and she wouldn’t notice.

  That is interesting. The only time I really tried to use AI to write was a noir mystery. Dear god did it suck. It couldn’t follow instructions at all. Show don’t tell is probably more on display in noir than other genres and it couldn’t do it without constant correction. It kept falling back to its standard voice of third person omniscient instead of unreliable narrator.

  There were parts that were written well, but a lot that was just grating and gratuitous. I had to edit like 85% of the output. I had to keep arguing with ChatGPT to write differently. And every once in a while it would swallow its own writing because it tripped its own content warnings. I suppose that’s neither here nor there on the writing quality, but we are far from having an AI write a novel without being full of tells.

  AI isn’t there yet in terms of a quality or undetectability. And it doesn’t look to me like it’s going to get there any time soon.

  on Anthropic’s ‘Watermark’ Text Adulteration in Claude Is a Perversion of Writing in c/technology@lemmy.world · 18 Aug 2026

• That isn’t really a rebuttal of my statement. It’s not even particularly salient. Sure your average person might like AI writing and not be able to tell it from human works — just like they can’t tell the authenticity of a photograph of Aunt Margaret from a photograph of Trump meeting an alien from Rigel IV. But there are plenty of people who can, and so anyone trying to pass slop off as their original work will be discovered. It’s just a matter of time.

  That being said, I use AI quite a bit in writing stories — though it’s more like solo roleplaying. I don’t think it’s particularly good at all, but it does while away the hours sometimes, as long as your expectations are low. I can’t see anyone who enjoys reading being enamored with AI. My wife reads over 300 books per year, and she spots it pretty easily.

  on Anthropic’s ‘Watermark’ Text Adulteration in Claude Is a Perversion of Writing in c/technology@lemmy.world · 18 Aug 2026

• If they aren’t heavily editing, the text will be full of tells anyway. I don’t think anyone is passing slop off as their own for long. They either use it a little bit and edit it enough to obliterate any markers and tells (which is fine, imo), or they are going to be discovered.

  on Anthropic’s ‘Watermark’ Text Adulteration in Claude Is a Perversion of Writing in c/technology@lemmy.world · 17 Aug 2026

• My server sits in Frankfurt. So everyone overseas waits forever for what is basically a text file. Unacceptable.

  Mate my first internet connection was a 2400 baud modem. Waiting a whole second for a text file is entirely acceptable.

  No, I get it, and good job. It’s about figuring out how to do it, and good job there. I’d have done the same back in the day. I have a raspberry pi with an ssd just begging for something to do. I have more ideas than time, though. Work is consuming all of my IT energy. I’m living vicariously through you.

  on Putting a Bunny.net CDN in Front of The Static Blog in c/selfhosted@lemmy.world · 15 Aug 2026

• The difference between what you describe and what I describe, is that a 100% match isn’t a hit. Nor is a 90/7/2/1. You need something with meaningful variability. Even within formal papers there are places where word choice is arbitrary as the article explains.

  Of course, you’re lacking the context of the full prompt and just feeding in the raw text. Again it gets way more reliable the more text you have.

  But it’s moot because the more text you have the more tells will sneak in and you probably don’t even need an AI checker. Those phrases that AI loves but humans use comparatively rarely. It’s not a tell — it’s the whole game!

  on How AI text watermarking works: a visual guide in c/technology@lemmy.world · 15 Aug 2026

• I’m not convinced that they even know 100% how Anthropic is doing it. I can think of an easier way that doesn’t corrupt the text: just find a bunch of tokens where there is a good spread of token possibilities, and the more often the most likely one is chosen, the more likely it’s AI.

  That being said, it doesn’t seem much different from what any of us do to identify AI text — it has lots of tells anyway.

  on How AI text watermarking works: a visual guide in c/technology@lemmy.world · 14 Aug 2026

• So… he vibe coded it, hit a bug he couldn’t fix, and said, fuck it, it’s a feature.

  on New messenger app sends texts by virtual pigeon and sometimes the bird just dies in c/technology@lemmy.world · 14 Aug 2026

• He just wants to drive down the premium charge to use frontier models to destroy anthropoic and OAI. Then his support for open models will dry up. But in the meanwhile, let them fight. Having powerful local AI under my own control sounds great.

  on Mark Zuckerberg Posts Deranged 6,500-Word Essay About Giving Everyone AI Superintelligence in c/technology@lemmy.world · 12 Aug 2026

• If it had changed to be trans and islamiaphobes

  It hasn’t. Or the block lists I’m using are fucking amazing.

  on Bluesky’s active user base is shrinking as its focus expands beyond the app: 10.4 million monthly active users worldwide in June 2026, down 27.2% year-over-year. in c/technology@lemmy.world · 12 Aug 2026

• Every last god damn word of this. Well said.

  on Bluesky’s active user base is shrinking as its focus expands beyond the app: 10.4 million monthly active users worldwide in June 2026, down 27.2% year-over-year. in c/technology@lemmy.world · 12 Aug 2026

• Maybe, if it’s created after the text is generated. Keep in mind there really is no white space to an LLM. There’s a lot of holes here. If it isn’t embedded within the text itself, it is trivially easy to strip such markings. If it is, it at least requires a human to paraphrase.

  On the other hand, if that’s all it is, it would be easily detectable to disallow AI from editing human-written code while allowing it to revise its own output.

  on How Claude marks AI-generated content: (1) watermarks embedded in text, and (2) signed provenance metadata attached to files. in c/technology@lemmy.world · 11 Aug 2026

• The text version must necessarily constrain the output, which will impact readability and semantic meaning, whatever they say.

  on How Claude marks AI-generated content: (1) watermarks embedded in text, and (2) signed provenance metadata attached to files. in c/technology@lemmy.world · 11 Aug 2026

• I think I had a fondness for Freewheeling Barbara Toys With Boys. But I can’t really say my tastes haven’t changed.

  Back before it died, I liked asstr.org. There were a lot of old classics there.

  on Cloudflare says humans could become a "rounding error" as bots generate 1,000 times more internet traffic in c/technology@lemmy.world · 9 Aug 2026

• Probably where I got my penchant for them.

  on Cloudflare says humans could become a "rounding error" as bots generate 1,000 times more internet traffic in c/technology@lemmy.world · 9 Aug 2026

• Don’t go that far. Do you know how long it takes to download porn at 2400 baud?

  on Cloudflare says humans could become a "rounding error" as bots generate 1,000 times more internet traffic in c/technology@lemmy.world · 9 Aug 2026

• Fuck MySpace. Let’s go back to webrings.

  on Cloudflare says humans could become a "rounding error" as bots generate 1,000 times more internet traffic in c/technology@lemmy.world · 8 Aug 2026

• Has anyone tried moving around little green bits of paper? Or no because on the whole it isn’t the little green bits of paper that are unhappy?

  on Cloudflare says humans could become a "rounding error" as bots generate 1,000 times more internet traffic in c/technology@lemmy.world · 8 Aug 2026

• I don’t know. Clearly it’s not that big an issue for me either way. Maybe Sony will have a deal. It’s all kinda whatever.

  on 'This Is Unbelievably Scummy' - GTA 6 Fans Are Annoyed By Netflix's Paywalled Extended Look at the Game in c/technology@lemmy.world · 8 Aug 2026

• I’ll start looking at 50% and see if it looks fun and if I’m bored. I don’t hate on 4 and 5; I recognize they are well made and entertaining, but they really aren’t my thing. They are a good way to kill a couple of weeks before I get bored (without finishing, most likely).

  on 'This Is Unbelievably Scummy' - GTA 6 Fans Are Annoyed By Netflix's Paywalled Extended Look at the Game in c/technology@lemmy.world · 8 Aug 2026

• Until it’s on sale on steam for 50% off, I don’t need to know anything about it, thanks.

  on 'This Is Unbelievably Scummy' - GTA 6 Fans Are Annoyed By Netflix's Paywalled Extended Look at the Game in c/technology@lemmy.world · 8 Aug 2026