@51dusty@lemmy.world
member since 4 Jul 2023 05:06
comments
- on Flock CEO calls for ‘compromise’ as surveillance company faces growing backlash | TechCrunch in c/technology@lemmy.world · 25 Aug 2026
-
on Flock CEO calls for ‘compromise’ as surveillance company faces growing backlash | TechCrunch in c/technology@lemmy.world · 24 Aug 2026
that makes sense. but I can still legislate which actions he and everyone else is capable of legally doing… e.g. collecting data to surveil members of the public.
-
on Flock CEO calls for ‘compromise’ as surveillance company faces growing backlash | TechCrunch in c/technology@lemmy.world · 24 Aug 2026
I guess that is my confusion.
why would “legislation to be passed that criminalized the usage of personal data for surveillance” fall under this attainer scenario? seems very similar to “legislation passed that criminalized murder”…
-
on Flock CEO calls for ‘compromise’ as surveillance company faces growing backlash | TechCrunch in c/technology@lemmy.world · 24 Aug 2026
wouldn’t a law against murder also be punishing a specific individual or group?
understood. thank you for your patience.