@IpsumLauren@lemmy.world
member since 6 Feb 2025 12:17
comments
- on Letsencrypt is under US jurisdiction. Is there a free-er alternative? in c/selfhosted@lemmy.world · 5d ago
-
on dating tips in c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 5d ago
Amazingly, the answer to #5 is yes!
-
on Letsencrypt is under US jurisdiction. Is there a free-er alternative? in c/selfhosted@lemmy.world · 5d ago
It opens the possibility of a man-in-the-middle attack.
-
on Letsencrypt is under US jurisdiction. Is there a free-er alternative? in c/selfhosted@lemmy.world · 5d ago
First let’s identify what parts of the world are free-er than the US (for a certificate).
-
on Had to do a clean install... in c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 6d ago
Same here, I run Mint everywhere I can, and the XFCE edition works especially well in old machines.
Alpine is better suited for servers and especially containers, because the images can be really small. If you got enough RAM, there’s an installation mode that runs on it without writing to disk, pretty cool for systems where you want always to reboot in the same state.
-
on Had to do a clean install... in c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 17 Sep 2026
Now I’m curious. What did you try that didn’t work?
-
on ‘I Felt Super Violated’: Men Wearing Meta Glasses on Dates Is an Instant Red Flag in c/privacy@lemmy.ml · 15 Sep 2026
I thought the convention was to call them “perv glasses”?
-
on Impersonation rule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 Sep 2026
Some parts of Music preferences are in fact, react: blog.jim-nielsen.com/…/inspecting-web-views-in-ma…
Oh snap! That definitely sounds possible. Found more info about it.
tl;dr: Either the attack is ineffective against some browsers that check the certificate transparency logs (like Chrome), or the attack is visible and the CA will lose all its credibility (hopefully being removed from the browsers).