@MBech@feddit.dk
member since 17 Feb 2025 02:24
comments
- on OpenPrinter update - On the Road to Launch in c/buyeuropean@feddit.uk · 4d ago
-
on Grandmother jailed for six months after facial recognition mistake launches $10 million lawsuit against Fargo and detective in c/technology@lemmy.world · 5d ago
I read it more like the grandma was jailed, because Fargo and detectives were hit by a $10m lawsuit due to a facial recognision mistake.
-
on People Are Pissed Off and Ready to Own Their Shit in c/technology@lemmy.world · 5d ago
I suppose the website owns their article though?
-
on OpenPrinter update - On the Road to Launch in c/buyeuropean@feddit.uk · 6d ago
You can also use sheets if you don’t want a roll.
-
on Bernie Sanders says if AI is coming for workers, it should bring a four-day workweek with it in c/technology@lemmy.world · 17 Sep 2026
You’re completely right. In fact, maybe we should force them to work 50 hour weeks on both jobs. That would be much better for their situation.
-
on Bernie Sanders says if AI is coming for workers, it should bring a four-day workweek with it in c/technology@lemmy.world · 17 Sep 2026
But if everyone gets paid for 4 days, does it really matter? I haven’t heard a lot of stories about people becoming homeless and starving due to going from 45 hours/week to 37 in the past.
-
on ‘I Felt Super Violated’: Men Wearing Meta Glasses on Dates Is an Instant Red Flag in c/privacy@lemmy.ml · 15 Sep 2026
Are you implying that no women or non-binary people have at any point abused smart glasses? That’d be a statistically impossibilty considering at least 7 million creep glasses have been sold.
If not, and you agree that there has at some point been women or non-binary people abusing the glasses, simply through sheer statistics, then the headline is needlessly gendered.
-
on Bernie Sanders proposes 20 year prison sentence for AI devs who plow ahead with Artificial Superintelligence plans - penalty on par with illegally developing rogue nuclear weapons in c/technology@lemmy.world · 14 Sep 2026
So you’re saying I could get out before my retirement?
-
on Diablo V Teaser in c/games@lemmy.world · 14 Sep 2026
I’m not a fan of the Path of Exiles skill tree, but I was so incredibly bored with Diablo 3s skills. There was literally no choices, just switch whenever you want something else. I don’t think the skill trees from diablo 2 were too complicated to expect an RPG player to manage.
To me the skill tree in Diablo 3 was saying “our player base is too dumb to make a single character choice, so we’ll just get rid of all choices except ‘number go up’ when looking at new gear”. It was absolutely a dumbing down.
-
on Backflip: Apple now wants to train AI models with user data after all in c/technology@lemmy.world · 13 Sep 2026
I keep getting them on my tv asking permission to show me ads. “not now” buttons deserve to be outlawed by the EU. If they can expect me to turn it off in case I change my mind, I can be expected to turn it on in the same way. Not by hoping someone in my household accidentally click “Oh yes, please bombard me with capitalist bullshit, PLEASE!”
-
on Side of slop? Bizarre AI food images jump from online to IRL menus in c/technology@lemmy.world · 2 Sep 2026
Maybe they suck at making the food?
-
on As demand for Meta AI glasses explodes, it’s harder to avoid creepy recordings | Ars looks at Zuckoff, the latest free app detecting Meta AI glasses amid privacy backlash. in c/technology@lemmy.world · 22 Aug 2026
nice, spicy pillow in my eye socket.
-
on Chinese video platform Bilibili is going global to challenge Youtube in c/technology@lemmy.world · 20 Aug 2026
I think I get your point, but if your business isn’t contributing money to youtube, you’re not really business. You’re not contributing anything of value to Google if you don’t bring money to the tabel, and why would they give half a shit about you then? I’m not saying it’s right, but that’s capitalism for you.
-
on Woman Calls Out Doctor Wearing Smart Glasses During Consultation Where She Had To Take Off Her Clothes: 'They Need To Be Banned' in c/technology@lemmy.world · 12 Aug 2026
Depends on the debate. The government can’t stop them from debating. If you host a debate though, without any government affiliation, you’re not forced to let them attend. In the same way, if you own a forum on the internet, you can silence anyone you want to. The literal ONLY thing the first amendment protects against, is government persecution for speech. It has nothing whatsoever to do with how people react to said speech. Just because someone cries “Muh first amendment!” doesn’t mean you actually have to respect them. You can shame them, silence them, ostracise them. Put up billboards telling people how fucking insane they are. Take out an ad in the local newspaper to display their bullshit in an attempt to shame them into submission, tell them to go fuck themselves. If they’re in your house, you can toss them out. YOU can do whatever you want. YOU can’t breach the first amendment, only the government can.
-
on Woman Calls Out Doctor Wearing Smart Glasses During Consultation Where She Had To Take Off Her Clothes: 'They Need To Be Banned' in c/technology@lemmy.world · 12 Aug 2026
First amendment only protects you from being persecuted by the government. Being ostracized, shamed and unfortunately attacked in the middle of the night by anonomous people isn’t against the first amendment.
Seems like the thing holding the roller, doubles as a tray for sheets. I don’t know how many it will hold though.