@Mistic@lemmy.world

comments

• I told you that you could stop responding a while ago. And you’re calling me clueless, smh

  on GrapheneOS defends use of AI for coding in c/technology@lemmy.world · 15 Sep 2026

• Then why do you keep engaging with me after I’ve said my piece?

  If you’re talking about the link guy, that’s not helping. Usually, people do that just to be a smart ass, especially on tech forums with their “go read the manual.” Yikes to those guys. Besides, they weren’t “blown off” as you said, there was also proper response if you read the comment once more.

  The other people who were responding to me were actually quite reasonable, it’s mainly you I have had issues with.

  on GrapheneOS defends use of AI for coding in c/technology@lemmy.world · 14 Sep 2026

• Decided to check your comment history. You DO just want to bitch about stuff. It seems you have a problem with everybody’s opinion.

  And instead of actually explaining yourself, what do you do? “It’s not me, it’s you”. Every. Single. Time.

  Dude, that’s miserable.

  Have a nice day. Like, genuinely, go have a day off with your loved ones or smth.

  on GrapheneOS defends use of AI for coding in c/technology@lemmy.world · 14 Sep 2026

• So, instead of helping me out when I ask, you choose shaming?

  If you just wanted to bitch about AI instead of having a proper conversation, you could’ve just said so.

  on GrapheneOS defends use of AI for coding in c/technology@lemmy.world · 14 Sep 2026

• Touché

  on GrapheneOS defends use of AI for coding in c/technology@lemmy.world · 12 Sep 2026

• Finally, someone gets it!

  Instead of going away, the AI will transform. It’s sort of in a bubble state rn. Once it pops, the fields where it’s useful will keep on using it, whilst those applications that have no real grounds for existing will either have their plugs pulled or resources cut.

  on GrapheneOS defends use of AI for coding in c/technology@lemmy.world · 12 Sep 2026

• Not compared to models from 00s or 10s…

  What’s with the reading comprehension, people? I was talking about pre-AI boom vs. now, not now vs. 1-2 years ago, c’mon.

  on GrapheneOS defends use of AI for coding in c/technology@lemmy.world · 12 Sep 2026

• Pointing to a wiki page instead of actually explaining stuff isn’t going to change my mind.

  Now, if you’re talking specifically about LLMs, however (which you could’ve just said so, ffs). I think their scope of application and resources wasted on them will be significantly reduced. Look at what happened to blockchains and NFT. Basically, I expect the same to happen here.

  on GrapheneOS defends use of AI for coding in c/technology@lemmy.world · 12 Sep 2026

• Apparently, not to me. Explain.

  Edit: Downvoting a person for asking clarification? Shame on you lot.

  on GrapheneOS defends use of AI for coding in c/technology@lemmy.world · 11 Sep 2026

• It’s not going anywhere because it’s already been here for a very long time, you just didn’t know about it

  What people call “AI” is just Machine Learning.

  Chatbots, OCR, Text-to-Speech, Speech-to-Text, Computer Vision, Web Search, Spam filtering or Fraud detection, Personalized ADs, even your phone’s camera processing algorithm.

  It’s all Machine Learning, but now under new and fancy “AI” name. And it’s been here for decades.

  The reason it blew up this much only now is because people realized that the more data you feed into it, the better the output becomes. And so they started exploring it more, to the extent of causing valid ethical concerns.

  on GrapheneOS defends use of AI for coding in c/technology@lemmy.world · 11 Sep 2026

• And they don’t pay for you skipping them, which is a win for advertisers, but a loss for Google.

  on YouTube Premium is getting yet another price hike for users across the globe in c/technology@lemmy.world · 25 Aug 2026