@Shayeta@feddit.org
member since 24 Feb 2025 10:37
comments
- on Shopify CEO says employees' 'slop grenades' are making more work for everyone else in c/technology@lemmy.world · 2d ago
-
on Stop Killing The Internet: No Digital ID & No Age Verification Petition in c/buyeuropean@feddit.uk · 7 Sep 2026
Depends on the country of origin.
-
on Man discovers Denmark’s largest Viking Age silver hoard while digging a terrace in his garden in c/europe@feddit.org · 7 Sep 2026
The page doesn’t say what % of estimated value though.
-
on Linus Torvalds used AI to fix a Linux bug, and now LLM critics on Linux face an uncomfortable choice in c/technology@lemmy.world · 1 Sep 2026
Most people don’t give a shit about ethics and the environment. They care about the well being of themselves, the well being those close to them, and their comfort, ABOVE ALL ELSE. even if they won’t admit it to themselves.
Delusional? I wish I was. Look at the last 30 years, how many protested to get climate change taken seriously? How many raised their voices against various human rights violations around the world? A drop in a bucket, that’s how many. Most people just don’t give a shit about anything that doesn’t affect them and it’s plain to see.
So yes, for majority of people, ethics and environmental destruction are “convenient shiny arguments” that make them feel good about themselves when they virtue signal them on social media and then forget about them 5min later.
Curse me all you want, the world of today is of our collective making.
-
on Linus Torvalds used AI to fix a Linux bug, and now LLM critics on Linux face an uncomfortable choice in c/technology@lemmy.world · 1 Sep 2026
They did, just on a smaller scale, and they used all games ever played by high-level players. LLMs and image generators were stealing data years before they became viable. And nobody gave a shit.
Let’s not pretend most people give a shit about ethics or the environment. Those were impacted long before AI became viable in any way. People hate on AI because it’s affecting everyday prices and employment. Ethics and environment are just convenient shiny arguments few actually stand behind.
If tomorrow billionaires turned around and said “actually, here’s UBI for everyone, provided by AI!”, most people would be cheering on intellectual theft and destruction of this earth, and call everyone still against it selfish and regressive.
-
on neurodivergence rule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 31 Aug 2026
I have a friend who would walk like this. Motherfucker can’t squat. Can’t even keep his feet flat when going into a half-squat.
-
on Stop Killing The Internet: No Digital ID & No Age Verification | European Citizens' Initiative in c/buyeuropean@feddit.uk · 28 Aug 2026
This is already the case for such services. When you go to their websites you need to authenticate. What this is against is general ID before even visiting any websites.
-
on Loving and supportive boyfriend in c/transmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 25 Aug 2026
The goal of feminists was to gain more rights. The goal of the parties who supported them was to increase number of laborers.
Both are true at the same time.
-
on Loving and supportive boyfriend in c/transmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 25 Aug 2026
“Women should have a right to choose how to live their lives. Unless they choose to be housewives, that’s misogyny.”
-
on GTA 6 leaks prompt Take-Two to subpoena Microsoft for Windows device IDs of everyone in three Discord servers — daily gameplay leaks shatter cloud of secrecy around the much-hyped game in c/technology@lemmy.world · 25 Aug 2026
And once again: www.youtube.com/watch?v=mf5Uj4XIT1Y
-
on YOLO in c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 22 Aug 2026
Timeshift? BTRFS Snapper layout!
-
on heelie rule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 22 Aug 2026
I’m guessing that by now Heelies are just running on top of brand recognition. Surely by now there is some competition offering a better product?
-
on Fired Rockstar devs don’t want you to boycott GTA 6 but ask for support - Dexerto in c/games@lemmy.world · 20 Aug 2026
Setting your expectations based on marketing is truly “smart money”. It would be a nice surprise if that happened, but the monetary incentive pales in comparison.
-
on Fired Rockstar devs don’t want you to boycott GTA 6 but ask for support - Dexerto in c/games@lemmy.world · 20 Aug 2026
Seeing how much they pivoted to multiplayer monetization in 5 post-release, I expect 6 will have barely any campaign with a roblox-like predatory multiplayer.
-
on different design philosophies in c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 17 Aug 2026
What? Why isn’t it just a vector graphic?
-
on AI Generated 3D Models Flood Market, But Almost No One Is Buying Them in c/technology@lemmy.world · 16 Aug 2026
There are people getting paid for it. So I guess it actually is at least for now.
-
on AI Generated 3D Models Flood Market, But Almost No One Is Buying Them in c/technology@lemmy.world · 14 Aug 2026
Why would you pay for them when you can just generate them yourself for cheaper?
-
on Top economist warns that the AI math doesn’t make sense: 'Profits are currently being funded by investors rather than earned from customers' in c/technology@lemmy.world · 11 Aug 2026
Everything you described would be a small improvement, not a leap towards AGI that is needed. That is why it isn’t being researched further. Massive investment for minimal gain.
-
on Top economist warns that the AI math doesn’t make sense: 'Profits are currently being funded by investors rather than earned from customers' in c/technology@lemmy.world · 11 Aug 2026
What does it mean to think? This is a open-ended philosophical question and has any number of answers.
I completely agree with your 2nd and 3rd paragraph.
There are similarities and there are clear differences. The reason why we say LLMs are different from us is because we DO have general intelligence, LLMs have not displayed such capabilities despite the intense pressure to prove so. THIS is why we say LLMs couldn’t possibly be like us. Because evidence shows they aren’t, despite the similarities.
I would be interested to hear what developments in the last month you’re referring to, would be exciting to see a breakthrough.
-
on Top economist warns that the AI math doesn’t make sense: 'Profits are currently being funded by investors rather than earned from customers' in c/technology@lemmy.world · 11 Aug 2026
I believe the people in frontier labs are doing their best to push in that direction.
I believe the investors believe they will have AGIs in a few years.
I believe the human species has throughout history repeatedly proven the height of its hubris and the depth of its stupidity.
-
on Top economist warns that the AI math doesn’t make sense: 'Profits are currently being funded by investors rather than earned from customers' in c/technology@lemmy.world · 11 Aug 2026
Disagree.
It is true there were massive strides in the last 8 years. But fundamentally, the tech is still the same large language model it was before, just bigger and better optimized.
It’s like going from an ancient, slow, Ford Model T that topped out at 45mph to a Bugatti that can do 260mph in 8 short years. It’s impressive, it boosts productivity, it is a marvel of modern technology, but that’s not my point of contention.
The issue is that AI companies have been funded on the promise that with enough advancements and upgrades this tech will achieve AGI. Which is an absurd statement to anyone in the field actually developing these things. That is the equivalent of promising that this 260mph Bugatti, with a few years of upgrades and advancements, will become a Harrier Jump Jet!
It’s just not happening, a fundamental shift in model architecture or technology used is needed. And from what we’ve seen so far, no one has discovered any.
A hammer makes a poor substitute for a knife & fork.