@Tetsuo@jlai.lu
Tetsuo
member since 2 Jul 2023 22:24
comments
- on OpenAI boss and Elon Musk back calls to put brakes on ‘reckless’ AI development in c/technology@lemmy.world · 15 Sep 2026
-
on Stop Killing The Internet: No Digital ID & No Age Verification | European Citizens' Initiative in c/technology@lemmy.world · 30 Aug 2026
The US doesn’t need more lawsuits, it needs better regulation.
-
on ArsTechnica: Ads and tracking infiltrated TVs. Now they’re coming for monitors. in c/technology@lemmy.world · 25 Aug 2026
Why buy these kind of monitors in the first place ?
I think there are plenty of monitors that don’t have weird online requirements or spyware in it so why buy them at all ?
Everytime someone buys a monitor like that they normalize the practice.
A monitor has one job -> displaying images.
-
on Maybe it's time for Penguin in c/programmer_humor@programming.dev · 16 Aug 2026
I spent the last 6 months on Cachyos.
I then decided I should probably update the Windows partition from time to time.
It tried to install the cumulative update, failed at 98%, then reverted all the update install to then reboot.
So now Windows doesn’t even update properly.
Next step is eradicating the windows partition.
-
on Anthropic just rolled out a tool that'll decimate some people's dreams of writing AI novels undetected in c/technology@lemmy.world · 14 Aug 2026
During inference ?
-
on Anthropic just rolled out a tool that'll decimate some people's dreams of writing AI novels undetected in c/technology@lemmy.world · 13 Aug 2026
To my surprise almost if not all LLM are set not to be deterministic and have one unique input result in always the same output.
They all are set to have a “temperature” setting so that they sound more natural.
Personally I think quality of the output tokens of LLM is surprisingly not as much their priority as the quality and truthfulness of the result.
I would 100% prefer a LLM that is purely deterministic and repeats the same answer exactly to the same question. Instead LLM are constantly choosing the next likely token more TL appear human rather than being accurate.
These LLM are designed as sycophants and set up and trained as such.
So a fingerprinting in the output seems quite realistic. An LLM is not giving you it’s best most likely answer. It’s taking one of the most likely answer and adds a sprinkle of uncertainty and randomness on top of it so it looks natural…
-
on Silicon Valley Splits Over Closing the Borders to Chinese A.I. in c/technology@lemmy.world · 7 Aug 2026
I applaud the open source Chinese makers. They might be “distilling” from the closed weights models of competitors but since they themselves pillage the internet with no oversight in my book that’s fine. In some way the Deepseek, minimax and kimi makers are forcing the weights of bigger proprietary open.
Right now on OpenRouter a large part of the processing goes to Deepseek. Deepseek is still weaker than the Claude “frontier” models but they are way cheaper. Since they are open weights anybody can compete as providers and the cost stays “low”. These AI Chinese makers are a constant threat to the american proprietary models and that’s a great thing for the consumers.
-
on Silicon Valley Splits Over Closing the Borders to Chinese A.I. in c/technology@lemmy.world · 7 Aug 2026
IMO OpenAI should stfu considering they completely dropped their good open source form for pure greed.
If they want to compete in the open source arena they should push their own models there ? IH wait that would mean releasing open source and not making as much money ?
In some way, this doesn’t change much to “search engines”. Before AI you had to search online and verify the result. Now you ask an AI and have to check because it will hallucinate when it doesn’t have all the data.