@apotheotic@beehaw.org
apotheotic (she/her)
Too cute to be cis 🏳️⚧️🏳️🌈

member since 11 Jul 2023 12:07
comments
- on Squirted Glock comp that doesn't suck in c/technology@beehaw.org · 9h ago
-
on [CW: misogyny] it's not that I like being called those things, just that they're better than non-affirming compliments in c/transmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 9h ago
I also really like using these words in a positive light. “Oh girl you’re that bitch”, “bestie you look like a slut and I’m living for it”, “living my best whore life” kinda vibes. Feels great, none of the negativity
-
on Alignment in c/transmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 12 Sep 2026
I don’t assume that checkboxes allow more than one input, nowadays. The convention of checkboxes vs radial options has been thrown out too many times by vibecoders :'<
However this time indeed you can tick multiple. Perhaps they should have a “cisgender” option too
-
on Alignment in c/transmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 12 Sep 2026
Having “transgender” as an option separate from “man” and “woman” seems very wrong for lawful good.
-
on [not nsfw just "spoiler tag"] [cw: slurs in anti-slur context] i am a femboy. in c/transmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 Sep 2026
I agree with what you’ve said here!
-
on [not nsfw just "spoiler tag"] [cw: slurs in anti-slur context] i am a femboy. in c/transmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 Sep 2026
To be clear I’m not saying that a femboy can or should “reclaim” the word for their general use. My intent was to state that if someone (who, due to their identity, may well suffer the same or similar nature of verbal/emotional/physical abuse as transfem folk, including the use of the same pejorative) is routinely called the T-slur due to their identity and presentation, they are, in my opinion, totally entitled to use the word specifically in calling out the use of it against them.
-
on [not nsfw just "spoiler tag"] [cw: slurs in anti-slur context] i am a femboy. in c/transmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 Sep 2026
The (hypothetical) femboy is quoting language that has been used about/against them. It is perfectly acceptable for someone who has been a victim of derisive language to use that same language to retell.
-
on People keep saying Lain protocol 7 is made but with AI, but this video shows it isn't? in c/anime@ani.social · 30 Aug 2026
Of course people care. Lemmy is full of tech savvy largely left leaning individuals.
-
on Repression is a terrible thing. I'm proud of anyone who grew past in c/transmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 20 Aug 2026
I wish it wasn’t people gossiping that Lady Gaga might have a penis, and how that would be a… bad thing? that affects them? somehow?
-
on ChatGPT, LLMs, and Automating the Fun Out of Roleplaying: Don’t let billionaires poison the beautiful creative collaboration at the heart of TTRPGs in c/gaming@beehaw.org · 20 Aug 2026
Goodness this is exhausting. I was not talking about literally being allowed to do something, that’s why it is in quotation marks. I was responding to you making assertions about my online “debate footprint” and how you attempted to use my relatively lower rate of discussing the impact of the meat industry online as a way to debunk my assertion. My (rhetorical) question was, how would my online behaviour have had to change for you to be satisfied upon trawling my posting history that I am not against AI for “trending” reasons?
Many claims may or may not have been debunked about AI water usage. My assertion is that its value provided to society is absolutely dwarfed by its footprint. Same can be said of the meat industry, fast fashion, etc. I maintain that stance even at your proposed value of 1% of the total water usage of the US. 1% is a lot when you are talking about the entire country’s consumption vs a single industry.
Your edit is wild. I’m “following trends” because I am selective about where I spend my time and energy based on where I am making the most impact? Would my stance somehow be more valid if I were arguing with brick walls online about other matters and not contributing at all to the causes I care about with that time and energy expenditure? Even if that wasn’t a wild take, its just a genetic fallacy and doesn’t serve to actually move the discussion forward.
Anyway, speaking of spending my time and energy in places I feel I’m actually accomplishing something, we’ve been talking past one another for a while now, so I’m gonna stop replying now. Have a good life.
-
on ChatGPT, LLMs, and Automating the Fun Out of Roleplaying: Don’t let billionaires poison the beautiful creative collaboration at the heart of TTRPGs in c/gaming@beehaw.org · 19 Aug 2026
I don’t have evidence on hand, but I have read compelling scholarly articles previously on the matter. Feel free to disregard this discussion point if that’s a dealbreaker.
I would argue that you care a great deal more about one that the other
Your argument would be incorrect, as I have been vegetarian for over 2 decades and vegan for the last 5 years. I’ve just found that trying to sway people online about the meat industry is a fool’s errand, whereas I have had decent success in having constructive conversations about the harms of AI. My meat industry related efforts are focused primarily on face to face interactions.
My stance on AI isn’t based on what’s “trending”, except for the fact that it, as a pretty existential threat in its current trajectory of resource usage, job displacement, and market “growth”, is rapidly starting to infest every aspect of my life. So yes, the trend that AI is following is causing my stance on it to be pertinent to a growing number of conversations.
I’m curious though, what would I have to be doing for you to believe that I’m… I dont know, “allowed”? to talk about AI’s water usage impact?
-
on Criminal in c/transmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 19 Aug 2026
Aw cuuuuuuute!
-
on ChatGPT, LLMs, and Automating the Fun Out of Roleplaying: Don’t let billionaires poison the beautiful creative collaboration at the heart of TTRPGs in c/gaming@beehaw.org · 19 Aug 2026
I’m confused, it seems we agree with eachother - did you mean to reply to the person I replied to, or were you just adding on to my point? :D
-
on Criminal in c/transmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 19 Aug 2026
What’s the sauce for the illustrations on the left?
-
on ChatGPT, LLMs, and Automating the Fun Out of Roleplaying: Don’t let billionaires poison the beautiful creative collaboration at the heart of TTRPGs in c/gaming@beehaw.org · 19 Aug 2026
I contain multitudes. I can protest the mass growth of datacentres for other industries as well as for AI.
I hadn’t mentioned water usage, but since you bring it up, AI datacentres are being plopped down willy nilly and sucking up all the water from their local area, causing drought. Thats one stark difference between it and agriculture, which isn’t having the same kind of local effect.
However, the US (and other) agriculture+ industry (again, I contain multitudes) doesn’t get a pass. Estimates vary, but it looks like about 30-50% of US agriculture water usage goes to feed which is destined for livestock for the meat industry. I’d say that a person can be both against AI and an outspoken vegan against the meat industry, wouldn’t you?
-
on ChatGPT, LLMs, and Automating the Fun Out of Roleplaying: Don’t let billionaires poison the beautiful creative collaboration at the heart of TTRPGs in c/gaming@beehaw.org · 18 Aug 2026
Absolutely
-
on ChatGPT, LLMs, and Automating the Fun Out of Roleplaying: Don’t let billionaires poison the beautiful creative collaboration at the heart of TTRPGs in c/gaming@beehaw.org · 18 Aug 2026
No, its worse.
When you steal human created art off the internet you aren’t actively harming the environment. You arguably dont even harm the artist because you would never pay them anyway.
When you use an ai image generator, you are actively harming the environment, and actively harming artists by supporting tools that are trained on their art without consent.
Just use the human art, or something like picrew where people make things specifically for folks to use to make their characters for stuff like vtt
-
on my trauma and addictive traits be like: in c/femcelmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 8 Aug 2026
Is that fucking Loop from In Stars And Time
Eh, all the 3d printing stuff is par for the course, the only “controversial” part is gun ownership, but if they live in the united states thats just a normal thing (for some godforsaken reason). The technology community specifically seems like the wrong place though