@baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
member since 6 Jul 2023 19:49
comments
- on A German city may soon ban smart glasses on public transport, pools in c/technology@lemmy.world · 10 Sep 2026
-
on A German city may soon ban smart glasses on public transport, pools in c/technology@lemmy.world · 10 Sep 2026
if violating privacy rights was so important then it should still not be done by facebook
-
on A German city may soon ban smart glasses on public transport, pools in c/technology@lemmy.world · 10 Sep 2026
smart glasses are not hammers. aside from the disability aid angle, they are primarily used by perverts for perverted use cases, and facebook wants to double down on that angle with face recognition, so they know their audience.
if these were prescribed by a doctor I would react very differently
I’m staunchly against normalizing being recorded all the time in public
-
on A German city may soon ban smart glasses on public transport, pools in c/technology@lemmy.world · 10 Sep 2026
it’s much more innocuous, to the point that many people can’t even tell you’re recording or wearing anything special that’s sending your image directly to facebook, especially if you drill out the notification light (which many perverts do do)
generally here in germany there’s a right to privacy if a person is your primary subject, even in public. you need their consent. there’s a difference between people being in the background and only incidentally and going up to people and “appreciating” them with a recording that facebook sees and also the whole world sees because you post it online as a way to signify your power over innocent women
-
on Grandma finds the secret knitting app in c/lemmybewholesome@lemmy.world · 8 Sep 2026
it’s a good story, and it makes good feelings happen in your body when you believe it in good faith, so it might as well be true even if it isn’t
-
on A German city may soon ban smart glasses on public transport, pools in c/technology@lemmy.world · 7 Sep 2026
blind people are actually decently assisted by smart glasses. it’s just a shame they’re mostly used by perverts. there should be a state-sanctioned version only for blind people, with limited features, and an open weights AI model hosted somewhere in the same country with data not used for training and such.
-
on A German city may soon ban smart glasses on public transport, pools in c/technology@lemmy.world · 7 Sep 2026
about the private security cameras, somehow amazon smart doorbells are still a thing though, and fairly common
-
on Picked the wrong day to start a Red Dead Redemption 2 replay rule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 26 Aug 2026
the monkey paw curls and you end up as a regular guest in a playthrough by someone who tortures all their guests using flamethrowers, fireworks, electric zapping, and crashing things into you.
-
on heelie rule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 22 Aug 2026
i don’t think so but I haven’t looked into it. surely shoes with passive wheels are kind of a very niche thing, given how mediocre the apparently best attempt at it (Heelys) is.
searched a bit and couldn’t find a good alternative either. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
-
on heelie rule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 22 Aug 2026
they do make adult Heelys all the way up to 15M US. that’s 14.5 UK and 49 EU.
edit: not all of them, but some, for example these: heelys.com/products/pro-20-all-black
-
on Chinese memory can now match the speed and latency configs of the RAM in our gaming PCs in c/technology@lemmy.world · 20 Aug 2026
unless they eventually don’t need foreign currency anymore because their own country produces everything they could ever need or want
-
on Spotify threatens industry with ad-skipping tool: "Skip Ahead" is available for Premium users in selected markets, and enables them to skip entire ad breaks, intros, sponsorship messages. in c/technology@lemmy.world · 11 Aug 2026
Huh
-
on Spotify threatens industry with ad-skipping tool: "Skip Ahead" is available for Premium users in selected markets, and enables them to skip entire ad breaks, intros, sponsorship messages. in c/technology@lemmy.world · 11 Aug 2026
Podcasts have ads directly in the audio, similar to sponsorship ads in YouTube videos and on other platforms directly in the video the creator uploads. I was wondering when an open source solution to that would come out, similar to sponsorblock for YouTube, but I guess Spotify is first.
Podcasts are still slightly different, as the easy pliability of audio means podcast hosts inject ads based on your location and other factors into the audio stream instead of just going with one single global ad for everyone. But you still only get the audio stream from the regular podcast host, which is why classic ad blockers don’t work. A community-run solution might be "for podcast id 123 skip from audio fragment “sponsor” to “welcome back”. Just purely going by time (skip from 10:00 to 10:30) wouldn’t work, as ads can be longer or shorter. There can also be multiple ads back to back even if they’re a standard length.
A service like Spotify at least partially hosts its own podcasts and probably does the ads for those podcasts itself, so it can just leave them out. If Spotify proxies podcasts from elsewhere, it can detect (via querying the podcast multiple times from different locations) where the dynamic bits of the podcasts are and cut them out. That could also be a community solution, though it would require more computational resources. A centralized service like Spotify makes it easier. Spotify is also AI-happy, and what they’ve actually done might be to just train an AI on ad segments, and let the AI cut those segments out.
By the way, YouTube already skips some creator sponsorships with their premium service.
i personally enjoy my privacy rights. it’s not like police here don’t use for example dashcam footage. they do. so our privacy rights are already sometimes being ignored in favor of practicality. but glassholes go a step too far. i do not want to be surveilled by a private company 24/7. i do not want male-to-male transgender (a looksmaxxer) chad broski to record women without their consent and then post the video online as power signaling, and to goon over it. make it a free and democratic association using open source hardware and code, and open weights models hosted in the respective country with strong privacy guarantees, and I’m maybe on board again. roll it out very slowly, address issues as they come up and don’t make the product even worse for privacy before regulations can step in, only to call it inevitable and the future and thus regulation-proof when the law has time to catch up. legal repercussions should be severe, as you are violating a fundamental human right.