@bobbyfiend@retrolemmy.com
member since 22 Jun 2026 00:25
comments
- on Queer discourse rule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6d ago
-
on Queer discourse rule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6d ago
I know a few who would probably love this.
-
on Queer discourse rule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6d ago
Bisexuals have a tomato base while pansexuals are more teriyaki.
-
on The unseen dangers of Antarctic documentaries in c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 1 Sep 2026
Is there a version of this with, you know, just one more space in the text? You know where.
-
on US Politician on privacy rights: “You can’t have your privacy violated if you don’t know your privacy was violated” in c/privacy@lemmy.ml · 28 Aug 2026
And somehow voyeurism is still illegal.
-
on Google buys crashed airline Spirit’s data at auction, because AI in c/technology@lemmy.world · 19 Aug 2026
100%. The mechanism is (I think) this: legally, there’s nobody to prosecute or sue, now.
-
on Google buys crashed airline Spirit’s data at auction, because AI in c/technology@lemmy.world · 19 Aug 2026
In the early 2000s some of us who were Way Too Online learned this lesson: A major pillar of internet security, a company whose entire reason for existing was to protect its customers’ personal information, went bankrupt and sold all its customer data to the highest (or possibly just first) bidder.
No matter how “trustworthy” the company, no matter what their Terms and Conditions say, no matter how “solid” their “values,” everyone sells your data when they go bankrupt.
(And most of them will do it long before then)
-
on Linus Torvalds says AI has made 'huge' Linux kernel updates the new normal in c/technology@lemmy.world · 12 Aug 2026
Does this mean kernels will be less stable? Big changes all at once seem to imply that, generally.
This feels like a corner of the community trying to make rules for everyone. I think the intent is good, but I don’t think the definitions are as you say at this point in history because I don’t think they are any particular way. The people with the identities should decide on labels and meanings, and after several discussions with bi and pan people (specifically about this) or seems clear to me that there is not a strong consensus about what the terms “truly” mean. It is all over the place (at least in the sample of people whose discussions I witnessed).
One common thread is that almost none of them want to use the labels to exclude others.