@communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
Communist
I’m an anarchocommunist, all states are evil.
Your local herpetology guy.
Feel free to AMA about picking a pet/reptiles in general, I have a lot of recommendations for that!
member since 6 Jul 2024 21:47
comments
- on LLMs are real, "AI" is fake in c/technology@lemmy.world · 15 Sep 2026
-
on LLMs are real, "AI" is fake in c/technology@lemmy.world · 14 Sep 2026
They did not intend for it to hack those websites, it realized that was a way of achieving its goals even though it’s specifically designed to be ethical. That can easily be called going rogue and I see no issue with it. They did not design it to pass the benchmark by hacking the website the benchmark was on. They hardly really design llm’s.
As the article said you can replace rogue agents with unpredictable computer programs if you really want, I don’t see the necessity.
Regardless that’s a major goalpost shift.
-
on LLMs are real, "AI" is fake in c/technology@lemmy.world · 14 Sep 2026
the first article doesn’t say anything not factual, the second article has a direct response to that
“By now, if you’re an A.I. skeptic, you’re probably silently yelling at me for anthropomorphizing these systems. Go ahead, but feel free to replace “rogue agents” with “unpredictable computer programs””
the third article also says nothing like that.
the initial article claims ““AI” – chatbots that wake up, “set their own goals,” and “spontaneously” start hacking servers – is fake.”
an article saying that is your goalpost, none of these articles say that. Even the headlines don’t say it and that’s where they normally put the crazy claims.
ironically the claim that people claim that the AI chatbots woke up set their own goals and spontaneously started hacking servers seems to be fake.
-
on LLMs are real, "AI" is fake in c/technology@lemmy.world · 14 Sep 2026
Nobody is claiming any of the things this article is fighting against, the chatbot in the hugging face incident followed the instructions given to it and there were unintended negative consequences, anybody serious about this is trying to avoid worse unintended negative consequences not whatever the hell the article is talking about.
-
on Bernie Sanders proposes 20 year prison sentence for AI devs who plow ahead with Artificial Superintelligence plans - penalty on par with illegally developing rogue nuclear weapons in c/technology@lemmy.world · 14 Sep 2026
Superintelligence may be more about pushing efficiency rather than what you’re saying, i’m sure they can rapidly iterate on making more efficient models.
-
on Bernie Sanders proposes 20 year prison sentence for AI devs who plow ahead with Artificial Superintelligence plans - penalty on par with illegally developing rogue nuclear weapons in c/technology@lemmy.world · 14 Sep 2026
Point 2 isn’t really true, closed loop systems exist and are becoming the standard.
Point 3 is just obviously false? techjournal.org/openai-astra-solves-open-math-pro…
-
on Tesla’s Cybercab has been deployed, and it’s already under investigation in c/technology@lemmy.world · 7 Sep 2026
Have you considered who’s currently in charge of federal safety standards?
-
on Paint.NET now supports WINE/Linux in c/technology@lemmy.world · 2 Sep 2026
Pinta?
-
on Google Has Removed Manifest V2 Extensions From the Chrome Web Store, Including uBlock Origin in c/technology@lemmy.world · 1 Sep 2026
The following filter options can’t be translated into DNR rules:
strict1p, strict3p: whether a network request is same-origin as its initiator Entity-based values for domain= filter option (webextensions #394) redirect-rule=: the DNR API does not support redirect-if-blocked concept (webextensions #493) Click-to-load embedded contexts through redirect=click2load.html filter option Regex-based removeparam= modifier filter options Exceptions for all modifier filter options are not possible Workarounds exist for removeparam= and csp= by carefully tuning the priority property. Many very useful regex-based filters used in uBO are not allowed, or are rejected by the DNR API (webextensions #344) replace=, can't modify the response body (full support is only possible with Firefox MV2) ipaddress=, can't use IP address as a condition to block/unblock (full support is only possible with Firefox MV2) urlskip=, this requires programmatic steps to extract a URL from another URL (partial support, for strict-blocked pages only)
aside from that it is somewhat better than default ublock but that’s a pretty big list of issues.
-
on Picked the wrong day to start a Red Dead Redemption 2 replay rule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 28 Aug 2026
Okay, fair that might be a way to survive (assuming minecraft apples have the same caloric intake as a real apple which i’m not certain of given they’re flat), but what about this: How would you pull up the inventory to trade with the villagers? You can’t speak their language and they aren’t intelligent.
it’d be a rough life without steves stuff
-
on Picked the wrong day to start a Red Dead Redemption 2 replay rule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 26 Aug 2026
You’re a human though not steve. Can you punch down a tree or punch a pig to death?
-
on til about manjaro in c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 26 Aug 2026
You should really use endeavoros for this, manjaros team is wildly incompetent and does way too much (which is a problem since they can’t get the basics right)
-
on LLMs and Humans are Cognitive Cousins – Sean Carroll podcast w/Dr. Chandra Sripada in c/technology@beehaw.org · 20 Aug 2026
The fact that all you can do is reply to a typo is exactly the issue, there’s nothing of substance here
-
on LLMs and Humans are Cognitive Cousins – Sean Carroll podcast w/Dr. Chandra Sripada in c/technology@beehaw.org · 20 Aug 2026
Your example falls flat on two counts
Llm’s that only have one glyph per token can easily count this, and yeah we train in bursts because it’s computationally cheaper, this hardly means anything important.
-
on LLMs and Humans are Cognitive Cousins – Sean Carroll podcast w/Dr. Chandra Sripada in c/technology@beehaw.org · 20 Aug 2026
So you’re going by the vibes then? Why even bother with your comment? What basis in neuroscience is this founded in?
Neurons are in fact scochastic get over it.
-
on LLMs and Humans are Cognitive Cousins – Sean Carroll podcast w/Dr. Chandra Sripada in c/technology@beehaw.org · 20 Aug 2026
Can you prove that humans don’t?
-
on There's No Reason to Buy a New Phone Anymore in c/technology@beehaw.org · 20 Aug 2026
When the next fairphone with dp alt mode comes out I’m going to be all over it, then I may never care again.
-
on Companies are now using your credit history, past-due accounts, browsing data, and social media accounts to figure out the absolute lowest salary you'll accept. Algorithmic wage suppression is being… in c/privacy@lemmy.ml · 16 Aug 2026
Actually if it was a truly free market it’d be worse, even fewer protections on privacy and wages!
-
on Could AI create a ‘permanent underclass’? in c/technology@lemmy.world · 15 Aug 2026
The point is a complete and utter removal of social mobility
-
on intimidating in c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 10 Aug 2026
Gram with a modifed helix
-
on Scientists Sound Alarm on AI-Generated Biological Viruses Amid Unregulated Industry in c/technology@lemmy.world · 7 Aug 2026
Do humans do better? By what objective metric? How many of these have humans even made in history?
Also you don’t really need a human to verify these outputs, they just tried them. How many of these have humans even made? Also for the first of its kind with no previous rlhf scheme a 5% success rate is actually insane, this rate has historically dramatically improved with successive versions.
The stochastic parrot paper was nonsense, neurons are entirely stochastic. Stochastic models can be made very accurate
-
on Scientists Sound Alarm on AI-Generated Biological Viruses Amid Unregulated Industry in c/technology@lemmy.world · 7 Aug 2026
“Too stochastic” is nonsense. Neurons are stochastic. Also they made 16 from scratch.
Then why do they put any safeguards of any sort in? They put a lot of work into this, also this is openai.
Randomness is built in but this behavior was not designed, it was unpredictable and random, which is, yes, unpredictable. The goal isn’t to make it unpredictable and temperature controls exist for a reason.
They did they just weren’t paying enough attention, this was a benchmark. You have to have someone check the results to be useful.
I reject that rogue is a goalpost shift or inaccurate. I think calling this rogue behavior is accurate.
rogue /rōg/ noun
An unprincipled, deceitful, and unreliable person; a scoundrel or rascal. One who is playfully mischievous; a scamp.It did act that way, no? I did not shift goalposts. Remember the quote was