@dev_null@lemmy.ml
member since 7 Jan 2024 16:53
comments
- on GrapheneOS defends use of AI for coding in c/technology@lemmy.world · 11 Sep 2026
-
on GrapheneOS defends use of AI for coding in c/technology@lemmy.world · 11 Sep 2026
That’s the communication problem in these conversations. Whether it’s a useful tool and whether it’s an ethical tool are two different questions. People come in and attack the developers for generating slop, and they respond that they are experienced developers who can use the tool properly to increase the security of the code or whatever. And the conversation here is about that.
And then someone like you comes in talking about ethics, which is what we should be talking about, but we are talking past each other.
The truth is most commenters are not technically skilled to evaluate or critique their decisions.
I don’t need to be skilled to evaluate or critique their decisions.
You are both correct. But the former is about the engineering, the latter is about ethics. You do need to technically skilled to evaluate whether AI is a useful tool for Graphene. You don’t need to in order to critique it on ethical grounds. These are completely different topics that have nothing to do with each other.
-
on LG smart TVs caught logging audio with screen off and snooping on local devices in c/technology@lemmy.world · 8 Sep 2026
Ok, so shareholders shouldn’t be liable after all is what you are saying, only people having a say.
-
on LG smart TVs caught logging audio with screen off and snooping on local devices in c/technology@lemmy.world · 8 Sep 2026
Can you link these reports? Not that I don’t believe it, but I see many comments claiming this and never including any evidence.
-
on Linus Torvalds used AI to fix a Linux bug, and now LLM critics on Linux face an uncomfortable choice in c/technology@lemmy.world · 1 Sep 2026
“AI makes it easier to be lazy and produce buggy software faster” is your claim, which I agree with. But I have to note that “thus AI can’t be used to produce high quality software” is not something that follows from that.
-
on PlayStation Wants To Prove In Court That You Don't Own Your Digital Games in c/technology@lemmy.world · 1 Sep 2026
Because you buy it. It being a limited license of course, not a game.
-
on As Ubuntu embraces AI, Debian discusses banning all AI-generated code in c/technology@lemmy.world · 28 Aug 2026
It’s a fair question. I think out of the two proposed rules: enforce no AI generated code, and enforce human reviews, enforcing human reviews is actually more feasible, and in fact most companies already do that. Pull requests need human reviewers to approve them.
It’s harder to enforce no AI generated code. A developer can always, at the very least, Google a problem they are having on their phone and retype the code from the AI answer into their work computer.
-
on As Ubuntu embraces AI, Debian discusses banning all AI-generated code in c/technology@lemmy.world · 28 Aug 2026
How do you enforce code is not AI generated? I don’t see how one is more easily enforceable than the other.
-
on XCancel also served cease and desist letter from Xitter in c/technology@lemmy.world · 26 Aug 2026
I hope you mean when he bought it, not when he announced it. He announces a lot of things all the time which never happen.
Lol you are so argumentative that this is how you respond to someone agreeing with you? Forcibly putting me into the “opposing camp” against my will. All right then, live your delusion while we fight AI without you.