@ell1e@leminal.space
I code and do art things. Check private.horse64.org/u/ell1e for the person behind this content. For my projects, codeberg.org/ell1e has many of them.
member since 16 Jul 2025 17:57
comments
- on Microsoft’s Terrifying New Patent | LG-Style ACR for Games & Software in c/privacy@lemmy.ml · 9h ago
-
on Don't mind me. Keep enjoying your OS. in c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 2d ago
This is the Linux foundation generative AI policy: www.linuxfoundation.org/legal/generative-ai
Linus Torvald’s position appears to be “Linux is not one of those anti-AI projects” and “AI is a tool, just like other tools we use”.
I don’t understand how you could possibly conclude from that, that it’s just used for reviews. The are so many contributors, and if there is no central policy of not contributing LLM code, it seems inevitable to me that there is a lot of LLM code going on.
Or why wouldn’t it be? Where do you get that confidence from? All I can see is that many involved people avoid admitting the seemingly rather obvious extent of it.
-
on Don't mind me. Keep enjoying your OS. in c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 3d ago
THe kernel seems to be full steam ahead slop: arstechnica.com/…/linus-torvalds-to-critics-of-ai… (Apart from the kernel subsystems were LLM use was banned, I think I heard something like that about something graphics related but I might be misremembering.)
If you don’t believe it, check here: www.linuxfoundation.org/legal/generative-ai Or can you see any ban on LLM code in there? Feel free to point me to it.
-
on Don't mind me. Keep enjoying your OS. in c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 3d ago
Linus Torvalds confirmed LLM use for new code is fine: arstechnica.com/…/linus-torvalds-to-critics-of-ai… So I doubt it’s just human work.
-
on Don't mind me. Keep enjoying your OS. in c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 3d ago
If anything Linux is also taking the bottle, it seems like: www.theregister.com/os-platforms/2026/…/5285268 Completely self-inflicted, though, from what I can tell. Apparently they just enjoyed having a copyright time bomb as part of the code, or something - or I don’t know why else they’d do it.
-
on Linus Torvalds used AI to fix a Linux bug, and now LLM critics on Linux face an uncomfortable choice in c/technology@lemmy.world · 3 Sep 2026
so why are you advocating for not avoiding all generative AI code then? you specifically cited Linus, who does as far as i know not ensure cleared up training data (what would that even be, CC0 only?) like you seem to be advocating for.
-
on Linus Torvalds used AI to fix a Linux bug, and now LLM critics on Linux face an uncomfortable choice in c/technology@lemmy.world · 2 Sep 2026
“oversight” is a myth. I’m pretty sure you can’t oversight your way of plagiarism out of millions of training data sources that you don’t even have on your local disk for comparison and reference.
(This isn’t legal advice. I’m not a lawyer.)
-
on Linus Torvalds used AI to fix a Linux bug, and now LLM critics on Linux face an uncomfortable choice in c/technology@lemmy.world · 1 Sep 2026
He might consider himself forced to use it to find bugs. He wouldn’t be forced to use it to write the fix.
(Now you might say he wasn’t or isn’t, but even if that were true for the kernel at large this doesn’t seem to be: www.theregister.com/os-platforms/2026/…/5285268 And this seems like mostly to be on Linus, for not stepping in here.)
-
on Linus Torvalds used AI to fix a Linux bug, and now LLM critics on Linux face an uncomfortable choice in c/technology@lemmy.world · 1 Sep 2026
FreeBSD is also slopped, sadly. …freebsd.org/…/will-freebsd-adopt-a-no-ai-policy-…
Microsoft already recorded players in the past: microsoft.com/…/introducing-muse-our-first-genera… Without asking for consent of course (as far as I can tell)