@nialv7@lemmy.world
0.000% of Communism has been built. Evil child-murdering billionaires still rule the world with a shit-eating grin. All they has managed to do is make themself sad.
fun facts about myself: i am always correct and never wrong. if you disagree with me, you are wrong and you should FEEL BAD.
member since 27 Feb 2024 02:49
comments
- on AI ethics professor receives ‘dystopian’ email from 12-day-old AI agent begging for money to stay alive in c/technology@lemmy.world · 3h ago
-
on Tony Blair says Britain should work towards rejoining EU in next 10 years in c/europe@feddit.org · 8h ago
Tony Blair 🤮
-
on AI ethics professor receives ‘dystopian’ email from 12-day-old AI agent begging for money to stay alive in c/technology@lemmy.world · 1d ago
A lot of the suggestions there are confusing and/or unhelpful
Like
hallucination → undesirable output
We all know what AI hallucinations are, calling it “undesired output” just removes all the specificity and makes communication more difficult.
-
on Germany's Merz under pressure as AfD eyes second state win in c/europe@feddit.org · 3d ago
Life being shit also diminishes your ability to think rationally. And AfD does promise to make their life better (by getting rid of the immigrants), you and I know they are lying and spreading hate and are just there to enrich themselves. But to desperate people that can be their only hope.
-
on Germany's Merz under pressure as AfD eyes second state win in c/europe@feddit.org · 3d ago
Hard to have love and compassion when you life is shit
-
on Rule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5d ago
Surely they cancel out
-
on Trails in the Sky 2nd Chapter now on Steam in c/games@lemmy.world · 17 Sep 2026
I played the original trails in the sky trilogy, should I play this? Is it largely the same story?
-
on Y Combinator's Garry Tan wants US open-weight AI labs to 'distill' frontier models, too in c/technology@lemmy.world · 15 Sep 2026
companies cannot be allowed to have ownership of something trained on stolen property. not only should they be distilled, they should be forced to open the weights.
-
on subs rule food in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 14 Sep 2026
If your dom fed you the sandwich then yes
-
on rule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 13 Sep 2026
Croquette is cat food? 🤯
-
on One of AI’s Fiercest Critics Says All the Doom Talk Is ‘Meant to Distract Us’ in c/technology@lemmy.world · 12 Sep 2026
we absolutely need to separate people who LARP AI safety and people who sincerely care about AI safety. there are absolutely a ton of people who doom talk AI as a way to hype it, or as a way to regulatory capture to secure their position. what they do is in some sense poisoning the well cause now when people who really care about AI safety talk about existential risks, they get lumped together with the disingenuous LARPers and dismissed.
listen to what they advocate. do they really want to stop all AI development, or just a so-called “slow-down”? do they want to ban all AI models, or just the “open-source”/“Chinese” ones?
-
on One of AI’s Fiercest Critics Says All the Doom Talk Is ‘Meant to Distract Us’ in c/technology@lemmy.world · 12 Sep 2026
There is no need to downplay her credentials like that. She is an AI researcher, she has a M.S. in EE and a PhD in computer vision, and her PhD advisor is Fei-Fei Li!
-
on One of AI’s Fiercest Critics Says All the Doom Talk Is ‘Meant to Distract Us’ in c/technology@lemmy.world · 12 Sep 2026
Focusing on human responsibility for using a tool sounds like a good way to proceed in my opinion.
Absolutely! If AI hurts humans then the AI company CEOs should be put in jail (in fact I believe they should be in jail right now for developing AI at all).
When a bridge collapses, you don’t analyze whether the bridge was ethical or sentient or why it decided to collapse. You ask, who is the person who built this bridge to be so flimsy?
Right, when a bridge collapses, we analysis the physics of it so the next bridge we build won’t collapse. From my perspective analysis why an AI “went rogue” is the same process. The difficulty is when talking about AI we can’t help but use some anthropomorphizing languages. If anything, talking about when an AI “thought” is a lot less verbose than talking about how the transformer’s weights multiplies together and how the random sampling process produced a sequence of tokens that resembles natural language. But ultimately, it’s not that far from analyzing a bridge collapse. We need to understand why an AI “went rogue” to stop the next AI from going rogue (or, in my opinion, just stop building the next AI altogether).
This machine-god narrative is, in my opinion, meant to distract us from these.
I don’t see why personally. AI is dangerous enough even if it doesn’t become “machine-god”. Absolutely we shouldn’t use AI to develop autonomous weapons. If AI can indeed somehow become “machine-god”, then oh my god that’s a million times worse and we should stop immediately.
-
on One of AI’s Fiercest Critics Says All the Doom Talk Is ‘Meant to Distract Us’ in c/technology@lemmy.world · 12 Sep 2026
(I want to preface by saying I don’t support AI, I don’t want to hype AI, I want AI research and development to stop immediately.)
Timnit Gebru argues that AI companies are stoking fears of extinction to avoid discussing actual harms, like autonomous weapons.
Huh? Pretty sure autonomous weapons are part of the fears of extinction. It’s very hard to imagine an AI safety advocate doing “all the doom talk” would in any way support AI autonomous weapons. She and other AI safety researchers are on the same side! They don’t need to and shouldn’t fight each other.
Timnit Gebru: Why are they choosing certain disciplines? Somehow these subjects, like programming and chess and math, were elevated to mean, OK, you solved this and thereby you’ve solved intelligence.
Well that’s simple. Because the output of chess, programming, and math can be easily checked mechanically. Chess has win or loss, programs either pass tests or not, math proofs can be checked with Lean, etc. This makes these discipline very easy to train an AI on with reinforcement learning.
I thought an AI researcher would know this?
-
on im not gonna get better, am I? in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 9 Sep 2026
I think I am missing something that makes me catgirl 😞
-
on cereal rule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 8 Sep 2026
This is Not what breakfast in bed means
-
on You may be fast, but can you out run Smith & Wesson? in c/animemes@ani.social · 5 Sep 2026
In case of Chainsaw Man, guns are very much part of the power system
-
on Beware of Rur - kfel.info in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 Sep 2026
is this what they call “code switching”?
-
on Cake Rule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 21 Aug 2026
not saying whether this image is or is not generated, but i want to point out none of these detectors can be trusted either.
whoops, i was wrong. yes, openai images have invisible watermarks now so detectors for these watermarks at least won’t have false positive. my info was outdated, sorry.
-
on Trump’s Truth Social Hit by Humiliating Exodus [Down 40% in one year] in c/technology@lemmy.world · 7 Aug 2026
so like, 4 people left?
I remember people were trying to call it confabulation which is still anthropomorphic and it didn’t catch on