@notSys@lemmy.cafe

comments

• No, Anthropic and ClosedAI are talking about such scenario.

  on AI staff 'genuinely frightened' for humanity's future, ex-Anthropic researcher tells BBC in c/technology@lemmy.world · 5d ago

• Search for “EU digital wallet”

  on Enjoy owning your devices while you still can. in c/technology@lemmy.world · 17 Sep 2026

• Nah. It’s funnier this way

  on How "secure" is your setup? in c/selfhosted@lemmy.world · 16 Sep 2026

• I run an AI Agent as root and let it manage everything

  on How "secure" is your setup? in c/selfhosted@lemmy.world · 16 Sep 2026

• What better way than price of services sold do you have to measure generated value?

  on Google’s Emissions Climbed 48% Since 2019. AI Is Why. in c/technology@lemmy.world · 15 Sep 2026

• So you recognize stalking is bad… AND LET YOUR CITIZENS DO IT???

  on South Korea gives 400 stalking victims app to track their stalkers in real time in c/technology@beehaw.org · 15 Sep 2026

• I don’t like them, but I think progress is more important.

  on Bernie Sanders proposes 20 year prison sentence for AI devs who plow ahead with Artificial Superintelligence plans - penalty on par with illegally developing rogue nuclear weapons in c/technology@lemmy.world · 15 Sep 2026

• You can’t just call things fake.

  Money is the best thing to measure value.

  Notice how I’m not even including emissions reduced by Google claiming parts of the market (so, for example, if Bing had 20% of search engine market share and generated 2X pollution, while Google had 80% and generated 8X pollution, Google taking over the whole market wouldn’t change total pollution output, because total pollution stays at 10X).

  on Google’s Emissions Climbed 48% Since 2019. AI Is Why. in c/technology@lemmy.world · 15 Sep 2026

• I’d propose the opposite: 20 years in prison for anyone who opposes AI research.

  Maybe not really 20 years, but small cut of profits (percentage!) to fund AI developement

  on Bernie Sanders proposes 20 year prison sentence for AI devs who plow ahead with Artificial Superintelligence plans - penalty on par with illegally developing rogue nuclear weapons in c/technology@lemmy.world · 15 Sep 2026

• Envinronment.

  Google is now able to generate 43% more value to the society (revenue) per unit of pollution. Their profits rose by 93% (market cap by 66%) adjusted to pollution.

  on Google’s Emissions Climbed 48% Since 2019. AI Is Why. in c/technology@lemmy.world · 15 Sep 2026

• Very good, considering how much Google’s revenue has risen over that time.

  on Google’s Emissions Climbed 48% Since 2019. AI Is Why. in c/technology@lemmy.world · 13 Sep 2026

• I don’t like GOS devs, they are not focused on usablity, but on security (which is completely valid, but it’s a shame that GOS is the most usable mobile OS), but holy based.

  If you are disputing AI utility in coding: Recent Linux kernel versions fixed up to 3 times more CVEs in comparision to releases before AI. Also, much less of those CVEs are found in the newer versions, which means new kernel releases contain better code.

  on GrapheneOS defends use of AI for coding in c/technology@lemmy.world · 10 Sep 2026

• Wtf is a nibble?

  on Bites & Bytes in c/programmer_humor@programming.dev · 10 Sep 2026

• Qwen 3.8 27B is very good at agentic work

  on OpenAI announces new slop generator GPT-6 Astra: Unfortunately not any better than the last one in c/technology@lemmy.world · 5 Sep 2026

• You can fork it

  on 1Password wades into a right-wing mess after funding a Linux project in c/technology@lemmy.world · 3 Sep 2026

• Fairphone can’t meet graphene security standards.

  Graphene isn’t also that much better than the alternatives (when it comes to things other than security).

  on Android Central: Fairphone (Gen. 6+) with /e/OS in c/technology@lemmy.world · 1 Sep 2026

• They are not wrong, when it comes to their platform

  on PlayStation Wants To Prove In Court That You Don't Own Your Digital Games in c/technology@lemmy.world · 1 Sep 2026

• They are not wrong tho

  on PlayStation Wants To Prove In Court That You Don't Own Your Digital Games in c/technology@lemmy.world · 1 Sep 2026

• Read the article bro

  on Linux (and other FOSS OSs) are exempt from age verification in California in c/foss@beehaw.org · 30 Aug 2026

• 1 & 2: it would work the same as all other EU specific things. You don’t need to comply with GDPR for people outside EU, you wouldn’t need to verify users outside the EU.

  3: I don’t know what you mean. It could be easy to modify spec of those certs to include names.

  4 You don’t know how this proposition is supposed to work.

  In short:

  There’re officially approved apps (you can’t just create you implementation arbitrary, but if you implementation meets all standards, you can work to have it approved). Using those apps, your credentials are secured with one (or many, I don’t understand that part) of:

  • Hardware secure element
  • Software secure element
  • External device
  • Server HSM operated by the provider

  Those apps must also use some defined encryption standards.

  When you create your app, it needs to be approved by one of the member states.

  The app can store all kinds of personal governmental things such as your ID, bank account number, drivers license, etc.

  When a service wants to know whether you are 18 or more, you can give them your wallet. The wallet app will show who demands what informations and a reason they put in the request. You can approve or reject the request.

  It doesn’t have to be tied to google or anyone other.

  Yes, those apps won’t be libre, but (and you don’t need to agree with me) in my opinion this is better than letting people create any implementation they want.

  GrapheneOS can create thier implementation, that relies on hardware security chip. Linux distros can create a joint implementation reliant on yubikeys and alternatives.

  Also, alternatives must remain.

  on Stop Killing The Internet: No Digital ID & No Age Verification | European Citizens' Initiative in c/technology@lemmy.world · 30 Aug 2026

• Do you know how the implementation proposed by EU works?

  How would that be a better solution? It is more complicated, more expansive and I see no benefits with it, in comparision to what the EU proposes

  on Stop Killing The Internet: No Digital ID & No Age Verification | European Citizens' Initiative in c/technology@lemmy.world · 30 Aug 2026

• Stop Killing Drinking: No ID & No Age Verification for buying beer.

  We (as a society) recognize narcotics, such as alcohol, as bad, so we ban the children from taking them. We don’t burden the parents, because we recognize that there’re parents who won’t care.

  Predatory online platforms are the same. If you don’t want to verify your identity, don’t use them.

  If you are forced to be verified (but age verification is not the same as age declaration) without using those services, then it’s a valid compliant.

  on Stop Killing The Internet: No Digital ID & No Age Verification | European Citizens' Initiative in c/technology@lemmy.world · 30 Aug 2026

• It is a distro. It has an ISO, community and can be installed

  on My Friend Lunic in c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 30 Aug 2026

• Based

  on PSA: Trilium Notes (FLOSS alternative to Obsidian) is now heavily AI coded with Claude in c/foss@beehaw.org · 30 Aug 2026