@untropvertimide@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Un trop vert timide
Pronouns: He/Him (by convenience)
I’m in the process of regaining some social abilties online. The fediverse and no connection to my civil ID did wonders in this regard, despite my disposition to anxious ruminations and my weak social stamina. Anyway, happy to join a safe space to be open about my queerness.
From what I gathered, I can describe my identity and orientations as: bisexual, polyamorous, trigender, demiboy (I’m a.m.a.b byt he way.), non-binary, isogender, demicisgender. (Both cisgender and transgender seem to hardly fit my identity.) I’m also closeted.
Centralized profile on pronouns.cc : pronouns.cc/@un_trop_vert_timide
member since 3 Aug 2026 00:02
comments
- on Bernie Sanders says if AI is coming for workers, it should bring a four-day workweek with it in c/technology@lemmy.world · 17 Sep 2026
-
on Bernie Sanders says if AI is coming for workers, it should bring a four-day workweek with it in c/technology@lemmy.world · 17 Sep 2026
I’d understand if these tools were small scale, eco-friendly, ethically developped and trained, and owned by the workers.
Considering most LLM and AI/AI-adjacent tools used are large-scale tools created and owned by big greedy corporations, I’d say the tools themselves are a product of late stage capitalism, thus the bad results they produce are results of simultaneoulsly :
- the tools themselves
- why they were created
- how they were created
- why they are used
- how they are used
- …
- late stage capitalism (which also influnce the previous items)
-
on Bernie Sanders says if AI is coming for workers, it should bring a four-day workweek with it in c/technology@lemmy.world · 17 Sep 2026
Both can be true.
-
on egg🙃irl in c/egg_irl@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 8 Sep 2026
I often resort to my dies/dices when I chose my character’s gender, class race, or other features. What does it say about me ? Not much relating to gender identity, I guess, except that I don’t have any problem with playing any gender.
(Still not cis, though.)
-
on egg🔘irl in c/egg_irl@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 Sep 2026
Yup, that’s the idea.
-
on egg🔘irl in c/egg_irl@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 Sep 2026
By the way, although being a IT techie, I didn’t even intend to make it a tech joke. That’s just professionnal deformation I didn’t even notice before reading the first comment.
I rarely even directly touch HTML code. (My devs are more middleware oriented, even though they are related to web apps and services.)
-
on egg🔘irl in c/egg_irl@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 Sep 2026
True, forgot this one. To combine, a multi-dimensional slider ? (Beacause while being a spectrum, gender isn’t a single axis defined by two discreet points.
-
on egg🔘irl in c/egg_irl@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 Sep 2026
The joke in my question is that I actually match all three options at the same time. (The joy of being trigender man + women + undetermined_NB.)
-
on egg🔘irl in c/egg_irl@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 Sep 2026
But why is it a radio button, instead of a checkbox? Snif.
-
on intimidating in c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 11 Aug 2026
I use
- sublime-text when not confined to a terminal
- nano for example with git’s CLI
- vi/vim when the others are not available.
-
on Gender change traps in c/transmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 9 Aug 2026
I didn’t see this one coming… And I should have.
-
on Gender change traps in c/transmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 9 Aug 2026
How does it work with non binary / isogender gender configuration (including agender, multigender, etc) and with gender fluidity ?
Reminder of my only two previous comments in this topic:
and
End of the reminder.
Your answer to that was:
What motivated my answer is:
Most events have multiple causes and multiple consequences. All of them can also interfere with each other. They can form retroaction loops too.
What I was explicitely saying is:
These tools were created and specialised for late-stage capitalism goals. There will be some common consequences, including bad ones, between usage by the big corpos and usage by random persons, whatever their skills. That’s why I said that both these takes are true:
and
It seems that we disagree about my view, but don’t attribute to me shit I didn’t say to fight this false argument.
So…
Apparently no, at least not when you oversimplify causality and misrepresent what I said. Still worth argumenting for others to have more arguments to weight.
Now, this discussion looks to me like the stupid “debate” around “guns kill people” VS “guns don’t kill, only the people using them do” in the specific context of gun control laws.
And also, fuck capitalism, and other systems of exploitation, oppression, domination.