@yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca
member since 8 Jul 2023 21:33
comments
- on No rule does it better in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1d ago
-
on Love y’all in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2d ago
Don’t forget to look at the bright side. There are people who want, not only that you survive, but that you actually live your life (and one of those people is yourself ;)
-
on unixsocks rule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5d ago
Staying up until 5am… I’d die the next day if I did that.
-
on People Are Pissed Off and Ready to Own Their Shit in c/technology@lemmy.world · 6d ago
I never thoght about it! Thanks!
-
on People Are Pissed Off and Ready to Own Their Shit in c/technology@lemmy.world · 6d ago
That’s a great point.
-
on People Are Pissed Off and Ready to Own Their Shit in c/technology@lemmy.world · 6d ago
Social media isn’t a sustainable model. Yes, there are people that have success in that model, but those people have to sacrifice a lot, especially in the content quality, to acheive that success. Many media companies have already tried it, but the content they produce ends up dissolving into mostly clickbait, because they would fail otherwise.
-
on People Are Pissed Off and Ready to Own Their Shit in c/technology@lemmy.world · 6d ago
There is a difference, and not just a legal one. For DVDs and BluRays, the disc’s first purchase partly funds the people who worked on the disc’s contents. With pirating, nobody gets paid (unless the pirate(s) that is/are distributing the content accept donations).
Although that does make me wonder how different is buying a second-hand disc from pirating… other than the legal part, that is.
-
on upgrades, people, upgrades in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6d ago
Yes
-
on Why Personal Websites Are Coming Back in c/technology@lemmy.world · 17 Sep 2026
On one hand, woah!
On the other hand, I’m sorry :( -
on Why Personal Websites Are Coming Back in c/technology@lemmy.world · 17 Sep 2026
Did you prompt an LLM model for this text or did you come up with it on the spot? In case it’s the latter, you did a great job.
-
on Flock Camera Tells Cop New Car Didn’t Have Insurance When It Did, Cop Writes Ticket Anyway in c/technology@lemmy.world · 10 Sep 2026
The police officer did the right thing. As we all know, computers are always right /s
-
on exploitarule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 10 Sep 2026
Baguette
-
on A/I Shuts Down, Stay Human in c/technology@lemmy.world · 7 Sep 2026
That’s why it’s better to just say anti-fascist. Anti-fascist is nowadays the clearest term for it. “Antifa” is constantly being used as a word for “your enemy”, so using the same word but with another meaning can become confusing to people who don’t know the antifa movement that well (which, let’s be honest, it’s most people).
-
on Why are these exam results full of check marks? (Wrong answers only) in c/animemes@ani.social · 7 Sep 2026
Because at the end of each of the exam sheets, it said “you get full marks if you don’t answer any of the exam’s questions”. As such, the lack of answers is considered correct.
-
on Impersonation rule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 Sep 2026
What’s a B2B application? Backend To Backend?
-
on He’s rizzen in c/animemes@ani.social · 30 Aug 2026
You see, that’s actually another guy.
-
on pro rule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 29 Aug 2026
“Your Honour, my client is not referring to their ex-wife by any pronouns, and stating otherwise would be false.”
-
on pro rule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 29 Aug 2026
Assuming you aren’t joking…
“It” being a pronoun would only become a problem if the challenge was the following: “while talking about that person, you cannot use any pronouns”.
However, the current challenge is instead “you cannot refer to this person using any pronouns, because the person has none”. That means we can refer to things other than the person with pronouns. And that’s what Anarki_ does. If you don’t believe it yet, look at the spoilered text above, where I show what each of the pronouns is referring to.Click Me! :D
> Maria says gets it […] Pronoun referring to: the removal of ex-wife’s pronouns by the ex-wife that the OP refers to. -------- > […] and that it makes sense. Pronoun referring to: the same thing as last time. -------- > […] - even if it would be funny to Maria. Pronoun referring to: not putting anything to refer to the ex-wife mentioned in the OP -------- As you can see, no pronouns refer to either Maria or to the ex-wife, but to actions and things said by these two persons. :D
-
on pro rule in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 29 Aug 2026
Maria says gets it, and that it makes sense.
I don’t know if “Maria says gets it” is a gramatically correct English phrase. In case it isn’t, I would either use…
Maria says Maria gets it, and that it makes sense
…or get rid of the passive phrasing for clarity, like this…
Maria says something similar to the following: “Maria gets it. It makes sense.”
-
on Oof in c/animemes@ani.social · 28 Aug 2026
Never say never
That’s a very badass firefighter shirt ngl