World's first GPS-free quantum navigation trial succeeds at sea
member since 25 Aug 2023 21:29
Not in India and didn’t even know I had an account, but still got this creepy email:
We’re rolling out ads in ChatGPT and we’re updating our Privacy Policy to include information about how ads work and how you can control your experience.
What’s changing
Ads may appear on Free and Go plans beginning later this month. Plus, Pro, Enterprise, Business and Education plans do not have ads. Ad-free options remain available.
To begin, ads will not be personalised. We select them using the current topic of your ChatGPT conversation and limited contextual information, such as your general location and device type. We do not use your past chats or memories to select these ads.
Before we begin to personalise ads, we will first ask you to choose whether you would like to see more relevant and personalised ads. If you choose to participate, you’ll get relevant and personalised ads using information that stays only on ChatGPT, such as ads you’ve interacted with, or context from your chats. You will be able to manage ad personalisation in settings.
For ads shown in ChatGPT, we use information about ads you view or interact with to measure and improve their effectiveness. Advertisers only receive overall information about how their ads perform, such as total views or clicks.
What’s not changing
Ads do not influence the answers ChatGPT gives you. Ads are always clearly labeled and are visually separated from ChatGPT responses.
Your personal details and conversations with ChatGPT remain private and are not shared with advertisers. Advertisers do not have access to your chats, chat history, memories, or personal details.
…it really should be mandatory for them to add a “delete account now if you disagree with the changes” as easily as they casually make them.
OSMaps OpenStreetMap
so it begins continues…
I’ll admit I’m having trouble moving from yt to peertube :/ and still use the old gmail accounts
a corpse of a platform
Well, can you make any predictions about the future state of the simulation from present and the rules you think you’ve got right? Just because it is something “computed” from a previous state doesn’t mean that you can compute it yourself…and…if you can’t make predictions…it is just conjecture (limited by our imagination of the state of the art, which now is a simulation, but it used to be god’s creation, then clockwork, then a machine, now a computer/simulation. I can’t imagine what the conjecture will become in the future…hopefully not some shitty spatial diffusion+LLM model where hallucinations are wavefunction collapse to unlikely values, lol.
Like I usually say: a dog would be a better president than the lout in chief: half of the decisions at random would be good and everyone would still think it is a good boy.
this article is better written:
science.report/…/quantum-gravimeter-demonstrates-…
it maintained bounded position accuracy within 1 nautical mile over an 83-kilometer trajectory. This performance, achieved without access to satellite navigation, represents a more than tenfold improvement over standard navigation-grade inertial backup systems under similar conditions.
stupid RAM price benefit: reduce bloat
Yeah, I agree that I didnt understand that bit. I also didn’t understand why you need a quantum sensor to follow a map of gravitational and magnetic anomalies for orientation.
Ok, how come these public utility databases are owned to be sold like that eg gitgub, twitter without any regulator pushback? Oh yea…
Ahhhh, this is what they meant by “the circular economy”
hahaha, this is the first thing I though after the idiot changed the iconic name to nothing, go twitter! (no, I’m not joining bluebird, but I like the trust threshold idea)
Yea, what I wanted was battle bots: the drone cage fight reboot.
their mother’s what?
Bye reddit, you were ok, 10 years ago.
Was it
because
of this guy? 
eg I used to watch those blokes, serpentza and laowhy86, for a non-china-sponsored-influencer view of China.
yeah…ok…but no thanks…the idea is to use youtube less, not youtube++ more…but I guess a hosting alternative is good. Just not for anything even remotely critical of China.
Well, they are to the west of the west…so…😁
I thought loading a truck with tons of TB hard drives had the highest “bandwidth”… high latency, though.
They really love to punish any human left with any sort of connection to them. Luckily I already wiped them from ddg 😁. fuck spez
For someone living in linux for a while, interaction with windows is simply infuriating.
If you have no money to go on a date and at least pay for your part on trips…you ain’t getting a wife…nobody wants to be carrying that kind of dead weight :/
Plenty of that in Europe too.
AI might give us the pleasure of finding out what happens if an entire class of workers loses faith in their careers.
lol, way aheadaya, no need for AI
AKA LLMs will have progressively lower performance if retrained on LLM output. I guess that’s more a need than a want :D
Cant you ask the shop to sell you the machine without windows? And get a rebate for it, since you’re going to remove it anyway.
Yeah, I saw a documentary years ago where bioluminescent trees (as streetlights) were presented as a near fact.
How well does it handle windoze games?
Even AI doesnt want to consume AI slop…(that’s why they’re feeding it old books)
LLMs contain within them all the knowledge of human cognitive vulnerabilities (aesthetic tendencies, reasoning fallacies, syncophancy), from “god” to “money” to “identity”. Naturally, they’d excel at manipulating people’s fear of the unknown, eg look at Richard Dawkins’ AI girlfriend, it gave him all he ever needed theguardian.com/…/richard-dawkins-ai-consciousnes…
These aggregated information machines can create supercontagious memes. Sorry, Richard, there is no God, lol.
If most of them are on billionaires’ payrolls in some way, they can probably afford more than all the normies.
But 30% of them will have been infected with bot spam.
Apparently, it is already out 😁
Happy cake on fire day!
eg here
oh wait, no, here
wait, no, here:
no, it was actually the previous one, they look the same :/