I don't think just cost cutting is googles motives alone.
Notebookcheck
Leaked documents show Google planned and then cut a key Pixel 11 security feature for GrapheneOS
@bourgeoisie_burgers@hexbear.net
bourgeoisie_burgers [none/use any]
smp15.simplex.im/a#n1kYcgA6rvuyY3wkQ9tuBJslfIpbLD…
053cacafad0420fc3cf76bd3a8b6d1ec6333ca36ec28741388cd9c65a779f3b050
ignore the bad takes, OPSEC Bible: opbible7nans45sg33cbyeiwqmlp5fu7lklu6jd6f3mivrjeq…
member since 23 Jan 2026 20:27
posts
comments
- on I don't think just cost cutting is googles motives alone. in c/privacy@lemmy.ml · 2 Sep 2026
-
on What's something people should buy today instead of tomorrow? in c/privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 Sep 2026
A signal jammer , unfortunately I don’t have the money to spare . Madeinchina have some interesting stuff
-
on GrapheneOS not supporting Pixel 11s? in c/privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 Sep 2026
I consider my phone more secure than my PC , but with more attacks made on it. Same for most people I think no matter OS if updated…
-
on What's something people should buy today instead of tomorrow? in c/privacy@lemmy.ml · 31 Aug 2026
Don’t want to found fascists. For me only path will be my own cloudserver with wireguard on it.
-
on I don't think just cost cutting is googles motives alone. in c/privacy@lemmy.ml · 31 Aug 2026
But would have make more sense to just turn it off. Here they removed it completely.
-
on GrapheneOS not supporting Pixel 11s? in c/privacy@lemmy.ml · 31 Aug 2026
0.5 million GOS , but it would make all pegasus targets easier, no matter the OS. but AI slop sure definitely a factor , but they also cut out a lot of the business sector that way. A lot burnt by removing it , must be more gains than what could be countered with an increase elsewhere in performance.
-
on What's something people should buy today instead of tomorrow? in c/privacy@lemmy.ml · 31 Aug 2026
Food
-
on GrapheneOS not supporting Pixel 11s? in c/privacy@lemmy.ml · 31 Aug 2026
Ah yea ofc… discuss.grapheneos.org/d/…/7 I would consider root at that point , despite it’s security implications…
-
on GrapheneOS not supporting Pixel 11s? in c/privacy@lemmy.ml · 31 Aug 2026
notebookcheck.net/Leaked-documents-show-Google-pl… thing is if google removes safety features and allow bad actors access to builds before users (4 months) why is that? Because they use the 0days and don’t want them stopped. And as I always said (before smartphones as well) you are just three steps from anyone. Including terrorists and drug kingpins. So you are by their own logic , a viable and legal target.
-
on GrapheneOS not supporting Pixel 11s? in c/privacy@lemmy.ml · 31 Aug 2026
notebookcheck.net/Leaked-documents-show-Google-pl… seems Google did it intentionally towards GOS maybe?
-
on GrapheneOS not supporting Pixel 11s? in c/privacy@lemmy.ml · 30 Aug 2026
Really? Even in own profile with gapps and memery sacurity features off? I Would be interesting to see how they pulled that off
-
on Android users can't remove nude-scanning app as Google opens the feature to app developers in c/privacy@lemmy.ml · 26 Aug 2026
What? / Android user without gapps
-
on Is this the death of FreeTube? in c/privacy@lemmy.ml · 11 Aug 2026
Haven’t used it , but invidious.io work ok for my needs . YouTube won’t even let me in these days. Fake Google account is an option also
Yea more overhead with secure chips. But they can do it ofc, they have done it so far. They choose not to, and in last minute without any heads up.