[Bellular News] People Aren't Buying New Games, So Valve Changed Steam
P03 Locke
member since 23 Jun 2023 23:58
These owners are just whatever lawyers have gotten ahold of the WinAMP trademark.
Anybody remember when they attempted to push out the source code for WinAMP on GitHub and failed miserably? Or included NFTs?
Reminds me of most liberal arguments. I usually agree with them, but there are some issues (like gun control) where I have to shake my head at the ignorance.
If you were actually in the professional world where people are using and learning alongside these new tools, you wouldn’t be so dismissive about it.
That’s what I don’t get. Do these people not have a working job? Are they driving a truck or doing manual labor? Do they work as a store clerk? Are they all stuck in the creatives industry?
Like, if you’re sitting in front of a computer as part of your job, you’re using LLMs. And if you aren’t, you’re probably using them indirectly and don’t even know it.
we would have also missed the train of the blockchain and NFTs.
Only an idiot that hasn’t used the tech compares LLMs to blockchain or NFTs.
And how could this amazing technology that literally doesn’t have a single positive point,
Again, hasn’t used the tech, and you’re stuck in defiant rage mode.
Well, fuck… how could I possibly win such a well-versed argument like that?!
No, you!
I don’t see ANY comments in here where it’s clear that people read the fucking article.
Average Lemmy user: Get baited into a headline about AI and immediately bitch about how it’s the worst thing in the world. No nuance, no legitimate discussion about the issues, just rage.
Also, the country famous for its Nanny State laws.
I’m fine with AI. I’m not fine with slop. Ban slop, not LLMs.

Maybe we use AI to detect the bad AI, and then blame that AI when it doesn’t work?
I miss Defense Grid.
Hell, I miss tower defense games in general. They really had a falling out 15 years ago.
It’s like bean mouth with animated movies and cartoons.
It turns out that most people weren’t that creative, anyway.
Honestly, I can’t get anybody to give me a good definition of intelligence, artificial or otherwise. Once we can define that in concrete terms, maybe we can finally compare the two.
Aren’t we just repeating what Cory Doctorow said? How is this just a Lemmy comment made to be funny?
Meanwhile, the US bond yield hits 5% for the first time since the housing crisis.
brain of a horse, speed of a man.
This is wrong on so many levels. We wouldn’t bother even using LLMs if they are were merely the “speed of a man”. And anybody who’s bothered to actually use the technology can tell you that’s it doesn’t have the “brain of a horse”.
Human review is still important, but the depth of knowledge they have is pretty damn advanced. The moment you completely remove the human element is where everything falls apart.
Also, who fucking cares about Howard Stern’s opinion on AI?
At this point, there’s so much bullshit from both sides on this issue that I don’t trust any of them.
In what way?
There has always been slop before AI slop.
This is such an incoherent counterpoint that I’m convinced this is just some form of trolling.
There’s so much information, misinformation, and random forum posts that using an search engine alone is hot garbage. And I’m not even talking about Google’s zero-click bullshit. Even using other search engines will only get you so far, so fast. Stack Overflow ain’t the resource it used to be, and even then, it was still rife with misinformation and noobs that didn’t know what the hell they were talking about.
The way I see it, there are two choices:

Whats stopping you from killing someone?
I have morals and ethics. But, not everybody does, and that’s why there’s prior enforcement to make the punishment a deterrent for the crime.
If there’s no enforcement, there’s no law.
Ain’t no war except class war.
It’s called “copyleft” for a reason.
In terms of murder, not every person is caught. But, enough of them are to deter the crime.
In terms of “no AI” enforcement, it’s not even a matter of perfection. It’s not possible to enforce except for the dumbest attempts, especially without also using AI to detect it. And if that enforcement comes about, then the evasion starts, and it’s hidden even further.
Wow, just speedrunning Godwin’s Law, aren’t we?
I guess I’m going to go back to work and talk to my five LLM sessions that are working on different tickets.
The entire point of GPL is to forcefully extract copyright out of the code in the first place.
I hate this attitude that if a rule or standard can’t be enforced perfectly, we shouldn’t strive for it.
This is the entire basis for the War on (some) Drugs. Guess what? Drugs won.
Power is nothing without enforceability, and purposely implementing rules or laws that can’t be enforceable is a form of malice and discrimination through selective enforcement.
You understand that car racing is the most blatantly advertised sport, or really, popular entity that ever exists, right? It’s been a running joke for decades how many sponsorships are plastered all over their cars and outfits.
Child sex crimes and child safety are topics that tend to short-circuit all reasonable objections,
Globally, there’s powers at work to get all kinds of “age verification” laws on the books, which we all know is just a thin excuse for de-anonymization and identity gathering. These same powers were fucking with Steam and Itch.io’s payment methods, because “what about the children”, which then ties to similar events with PornHub a few years earlier. Congress passed three different “Internet child safety” laws in the 2000s and 2010s, and all three were struck down by the Supreme Court for being unconstitutional. Decades earlier, DARE abused “child safety” justifications for personal gains.
This excuse is used all the time, and the emotional weight it carries makes it shocking effective to the proles that buy it at face value.
Cloudflare’s blog posts are always more interesting. They have a really good postmortem process.
The problem is that there’s no existing law that would effect this on its own. To my knowledge, no country in the world has a law on the books specifically dealing with AI models trained on CSAM. So the question, under existing laws, would turn on whether the data stored within the model itself would constitute CSAM.
CSAM laws are already overreaching in dimensions that are rife with abuse. It’s rare to have a law where owning a picture of something is highly illegal. It’s the only law I know of where somebody can just send you a picture on your phone, and suddenly, you’re breaking the law. You could be arrested and thrown in prison for even admitting that somebody else sent you the picture.
Police use CSAM as an excuse all the time to search without a warrant. Remember the duress passcode case? Police claimed he had CSAM on his phone, when everybody knew they were targeting his activist work.
And what should we really care about? The CSA. Go after the CSA. Focus on the abuse. The Epstein files are right over there.
The core llama.cpp maintainers also work at HF and will now work for Nvidia I guess. Llama.cpp is a pretty significant part of the local LLM stack, especially since other tools like Ollama and LMStudio are just GUIs built on top.
I guess that explains why features like quantized KV caches are lagging behind. Maintainers are purposely dragging their feet.
the community may need to step up our game and get our eggs out of the big tech basket.
The community has chosen to not fight at all, which is worse. Anti-AI sentiment is at an all-time high.
Publicly. Privately, these hypocrites still whisper in ChatGPT’s ear when they get lazy enough. Or use some feature in Photoshop or some other software that they didn’t even understand was AI-driven.
We are in a war with the rich. Always have been. We will never have nice things unless you take it from them.
The way things are going at Huggingface now, I imagine we probably will have to start building the infrastructure we need to handle AI models as distributed links sooner rather than later.
Then “we” better get started. Mega corpos have fully embraced LLMs, to the point that they’ve distrusted human input too much, which is still a vital component of successful adoption. Eventually, more and more companies will wise up and figure out how to find the right balance.
Where are we at? Oh, right… we’re too busy arguing about how all AI is bad and sticking our fucking heads in the sand until the Big Bad AI Problem goes away.
We have to fix our attitudes if we have any hope of surviving this mess and not ending up as a Cyberpunk-wannabe dystopia by the time 2077 hits. Use the fucking weapons given to us!
You’re the one that equated “unpopularity” with “not a viable solution” with that ~1% response.
Popularity and technical viability have nothing to do with each other. It’s just that the former requires a lot of marketing to push the general public forward, way more than is necessary in my opinion.
Solar panels make up ~1% of all residential power generation. I guess that means it’s a horrible way to generate power, right? 🙄
If you watch the video, you’ll understand that the temperature transfer process to a hot water tank is incredibly slow. So, water tanks are not a very good battery.
I mean, unless you want to spend 12 hours trying to dry your clothes.
Twitch streamers, YouTube channels, book best seller lists, radio play lists…
Not sure how that statement is right-leaning.
I partially blame the whole Oracle / OpenAI / NVIDIA cabal.
But, let’s not ignore the memory cartel’s involvement in this sham. Shitbags left themselves vulnerable to a demand crash with tiny numbers of competitors (three), tiny amounts of facilities to produce RAM, and the corporate stranglehold to keep it that way.
Not typically in the world of YouTube. That’s kind of the point.
That’s what happens after a buyout.
As shitty as Meta is, I really don’t like the reductive nature of this headline. Here is the original Guardian article:
theguardian.com/…/meta-ban-virginia-woolf-a-room-…
“Meta bans ads for Virginia Woolf play in Spain because they relate to feminism”
This turned into “Meta Now Banning Ads That Promote Feminism”, with a quote from the showrunner to make it sound even more scary. Frankly, either of them can barely be called journalism, because they can’t be bothered to write more than a page on the subject.