Joint Letter Sent to Voice Concerns Over Bill C-22
member since 24 Jun 2023 22:38
But for physical goods, the minimum price is what the store paid for acquiring or producing it in the first place. That isn’t a consideration for digital goods.
Compared to many other currency conversions in the world, it is very close. When I read prices in USD, I think of them as euro prices in my head.
Since digital copies cost nearly zero to make, prices of digital goods such as video games are completely arbitrary anyway; they are set to whatever people are willing to pay.
The conversion rate between EUR and USD is so ridiculously close to 1 that it makes sense to treat them as essentially equivalent. If you don’t, you’ll just spend unnecessary effort converting to and from numbers that aren’t round.
And yet, the Internet also created the free culture movement. There has long been a vocal movement on the Internet for making copyright less restrictive. I have long been sympathetic to such; copying is not theft…
So I don’t find that outrageous in isolation, though I do find it hypocritical because Microsoft is otherwise very much not a company in favor of less restrictive copyright, certainly not as far as its own source code is concerned.
Wait, has that become open source again in recent releases? I remember it not being for a while, but the repo currently says Apache 2.0? Anyone know more about it?
Those things have been called AI long before 2022. In university I took a course whose name translates to “introduction to artificial intelligence” and while I don’t remember a lot about it, I do remember that one of the things we learned about there was neural networks.
which is going to be all tech legally required to :(
I grew up in a time of technology being a liberating force that helped us live in a society more firmly based on individual rights.
I no longer live in that world.
I’ve done it at my job.
you’re becoming dependent on a subscription service offered by a trillion dollar company that can increase the price tenfold at will, or cut you from the platform entirely
with local open weight models that is no longer an argument tbh
I don’t see anything wrong with using AI for almost anything at all (including this), as long as there is human review every time. I do not see how the free software philosophy, by itself, either endorses or condemns AI.
Certainly the pictures and videos on wikipedia which you chose to consider pornographic rather than neutrally informative have a different set of qualities then what you would find in the extreme sections of porn-serving websites.
Look into the Wikimedia Commons category “pornographic videos” and you’ll see what I’m talking about. Not linking to it because I’m not sure I’m allowed to do that here.
There is a middle ground. You can give partial access.
Hence why I wrote specifically about the open Internet. You are right: there are ways to give people access to only a selected part of the Internet. If parents decide to do that, fine; doesn’t have to concern any website operators, or any adults.
Nobody is banning the youth from accessing wikipedia or a library or minecraft.
Wikipedia has pornographic images and videos in it (certainly in its media archive, Wikimedia Commons, and some of them are embedded in articles).
Library: ??? Are we still talking about the Internet?
But also, if the parents decide that it’s part of growing up they can just give their kids access to porn.
Yes. Giving kids access to the open Internet is giving them access to a repository of nearly all human knowledge and endeavors, including (but not limited to) porn. If parents believe their child isn’t yet developmentally ready to be exposed to all human knowledge and endeavors, they shouldn’t be giving that child (unsupervised) access to a worldwide information system whose entire purpose is to provide access to exactly that.
Just saying that there are ways to do it right.
No, there is no way to do “censoring access to information for young people” right. That remains an entirely illegitimate goal no matter which mechanisms you invent for doing it in a privacy preserving manner.
Haven’t heard of anything about this being done on a device level.
Then you simply missed a few news stories:
This is why countries need constitutions that limit what laws governments are allowed to pass. This is approximately the prototype of something governments just shouldn’t be allowed to ever do.
The en.wikipedia.org/…/First_Amendment_to_the_United_… is a part of the US Constitution that prohibits laws violating certain specific rights, two of them being the freedom of speech and freedom of the press. Many other countries have some equivalent to this too.
The relevance here is that taking photos of public spaces is part of freedom of speech and of the press.
I don’t know anyone who was on the fence, and decided to enlist after visiting the army booth at Gamescom lol
The idea is, like of most marketing, probably more that some people might not have been very aware that it was an option and that there are these kinds of jobs in the army.
No, the translation I was referring to didn’t say “Kursive”, it said “kursiv”, I definitely remember that. That was the episode with Cypress Creek and Hank Scorpio where Bart is asked whether he never learned cursive…
“Kursiv” really just translates back to “italic” despite being a cognate of “cursive”. Outside one bad translation of a Simpsons episode, I have never heard connected handwriting referred to as “kursiv” in German.
An SQL clause walks into a bar. It walks up to two tables and asks: “Can I join you?”
Of course, there are many .onion websites that can’t be accessed through the clearnet, that’s kinda the point of them.
This would actually not meet the criteria of free and open source software if it were real.
mass surveillance
A slightly better argument than “ineffective”, but still not the central reason why it’s bad. I can think of ways to make it work without mass surveillance, but I’m not writing about them because I don’t want to give any politicians who may be reading this any ideas.
banning SM for kids -16 alleviates them being cyberbullied
So that they can get bullied IRL instead, very much better amirite… /s
exposure to violent or sexual content
You see, I remember being a minor and adults trying to keep me away from violent or sexual content. I still do not see what the fuck is supposed to have changed on my 16th or 18th birthday or whenever that it would be ok afterwards, but not before?!
We should not argue against it on the grounds that it is ineffective. That just implies that it needs to be made more effective.
We should argue that democratization of information sharing is a good thing for society, and anyone wanting to reverse it is an authoritarian enemy of a free society.
Social media makes sure politicians and other powerful people cannot control very well what information people less powerful than them receive. No surprise that politicians may want to ban it (first for kids, maybe later for everyone?).
I thought the goal was precisely not profit? 😂😂😂
But yes, this is exactly what I meant.
“Web” means HTTP and HTML.
I fail to understand the point of this.
If the goal is to be able to deliver documents without any JS, cookies, tracking, etc., then why not just deliver documents that way through the web? No one is forcing anyone to put those things on any website.
I would not do that without first looking into applicable laws regarding legal liability for content and requirements to remove things. Depending on where in the world you are, this can be a minefield.
A disc as well as its packaging still cost money; also, a physical store needs to pay rent and salaries.