Back to school sale on GoG
www.gog.compreview
Download the best classic and new games on Windows, Mac & Linux. A vast selection of titles, DRM-free, with free goodies and 30-day money-back guarantee.
Buy European
Download the best classic and new games on Windows, Mac & Linux. A vast selection of titles, DRM-free, with free goodies and 30-day money-back guarantee.
“”" An open source project the size of Lemmy needs constant work to manage the project, implement new features and fix bugs. Dessalines and Nutomic work full-time on these tasks and more. As there is no advertising or tracking, all of our work is funded through donations. Even so there is barely enough time in the day, and no time for a second job. The only available option are user donations. To keep it viable donations need to reach a minimum of 5000€ per month, resulting in a modest salary of 2500€ per developer. If that goal is reached we can stop worrying about money, and fully focus on improving the software for the benefit of all users and instances. We especially rely on recurring donations to secure the long-term development and make Lemmy the best it can be.
If you want more information before donating, consider the comparison with Reddit. It began as startup funded by rich investors. The site is managed by corporate executives who over time have become more and more disconnected from normal users. Their main goal is to make investors happy and to make a profit. This leads to user-hostile decisions like firing the employee responsible for AMAs, blocking third-party apps and more. As Reddit is a single website under a single authority, it means all users need to follow the same rules, including ridiculous ones like censoring the name “Luigi”.
Lemmy represents a new type of social media which is the complete opposite of Reddit. It is split across many different websites, each with its own rules, and managed by normal people who actually care about the users. There is no company and no profit motive. Much of the work is carried out by volunteer admins, mods and posters, who contribute out of enthusiasm and not for money. For users this is great as there is no advertising nor tracking, and no chance of takeover by a billionaire. Additionally there are no builtin political or ideological restrictions. You can use the software for any purpose you like, add your own restrictions or scrutinize its inner workings. Lemmy truly belongs to everyone.
Note: Donations via OpenCollective also finance the hosting of lemmy.ml, which is used to test new versions before release.
Nutomic and Dessalines, Lemmy Developers “”“”
The European Union will suspend imports of Brazilian meat and other animal products from Thursday, citing concerns over Brazil’s compliance with EU rules on antibiotic use in livestock. The move affects poultry, beef, eggs and honey, with Brussels offering no timeline for when trade can resume.
The European Union will suspend imports of Brazilian meat and other animal products from Thursday, pending assurances from Brazil that it is complying with the bloc’s animal health rules.
I’m looking for an electric shaver, but I’m totally lost. I saw the Philips one, but I saw that I have to pay for the head every couple months.
What are you using and which one you would recommend?
Germany’s openDesk — a sovereign, open-source office and collaboration suite — is being rolled out across public administration. Here is what it includes and why it matters.
Think about this given what happened this week with the fascist US government designating Autistici/Inventati – an anti-fascist Italian .org providing internet support to activists – as terrorists, sanctioning them, and knocking them off the Internet (solely by weaponizing Executive Order 13224 which was established shortly after 9/11 to target ruthless assassins)
This doesn’t just concern domains. If you’re an anti-fascist or anti-genocide org or group, the fascist US government can designate you a terrorist group and sanction you thereby cutting you off from banking, hosting, and almost all other infrastructure providers with zero due process in the EU.
The US government possibly is starting to identify decentralized media infrastructure as a threat to its survival. (or the big tech’s survival and starting a crackdown - remember when Meta Caught Paying Nazis to Post on Facebook?)
Read Autistici/Inventati’s history on the article The Server Called Paranoia: Defend Autistici/Inventati Before September 25 by We Will Free Us, an antifascist media collective.
There’s also a book publicly available: +KAOS: Ten Years of Hacking and Media Activism (archive.org) by Autistici/Inventati
#AutisticiInventati #AICrackdown20
The Swedish Transport Administration was recently revealed purchasing Microsoft services and discarding their own regulations and any Swedish or EU laws in the process. The following text is a translation of news article by the Swedish public broadcaster Sveriges Radio. “Ekot” is one of their programs and “P4 Dalarna” is one of their regional stations. Minor edits were done to the raw translation for clarification.
When the Swedish Transport Administration was about to sign a license agreement with Microsoft last year, the agency’s lawyers discovered several problematic points in Microsoft’s standard terms.
They entered into a negotiation that is described in detail in a service note that Ekot and P4 Dalarna have seen.
The lawyers identified 18 conditions that needed to be in the agreement – as minimum requirements.
The demands were brought up in negotiations with Microsoft, which responded that it was not willing to meet any of them.
The points were then whittled down to a shorter list, which included, among other things, that Microsoft, like all other suppliers, would have to accept that the Swedish Transport Administration may have to release information in accordance with the public disclosure principle.
And also that the storage, processing and transfer of data must comply with Swedish and EU legislation, and that Microsoft would have to pay a fine in the event of deficiencies and would not be able to terminate the agreement without reason.
But the slimmed-down list of demands was also rejected, and after Swedish Transport Administration’s stripped down its list again, there were only three demands left, which were described as “absolutely necessary”.
But Microsoft also said no to them, and had thus finally rejected all minimum requirements.
But despite that, the Swedish Transport Administration then decided to accept the agreement, because the tech giant’s delivery was considered crucial for the business.
According to the IT researcher Björn Lundell, it is difficult to gain insight into how this type of negotiation takes place, and it is unusual for it to be this clear how authorities choose to accept the terms of the tech giants.
– I would say that is unusual. It’s not what you usually see.
The Swedish Transport Administration does not agree to an interview, but states in a written comment that it cooperates with both suppliers and other authorities to ensure that cloud services meet all requirements for both security, legality and digital sovereignty.
Suitability assessments will also be carried out, to prevent security risks, before introducing cloud services. But they don’t want any further details around that so as not to “expose vulnerabilities”.
Microsoft declines an interview and writes in an email that it does not comment on individual customers, but that it works together with customers to find opportunities and risks and that it has all protections in place for data.
[3 media attachments] Dear friends,
Please gather around for a long post about #WSocial and how they are responding to critiques.
I have noticed a trend: W Social leaders and staunch supporters are describing any critical posts about the company as “targeted disinformation.” Its CEO said they will soon have a technical solution in place for this. Oh?!?
🔗: https://mu.social/profile/anna.wsocial.eu/post/3mtqufy6g4s2r
I suppose the “targeted disinformation” claims are about recent posts by the likes of me and @pallenberg about troubling hate speech that is allowed on W Social.
Claims backed by hard evidence, in the form of screenshots and video captures. (I am increasingly doing screen recordings of problematic posts and interactions by W Social people because they have a tendency to delete evidence - like an infamous comment on a video by the Instutute for Remigration).
⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️
Discrediting sources, renaming evidence as “disinformation” and creating a victim narrative has a long, storied history.
⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️
But I’m digressing. I speak up about W Social because:
Mainstream media runs PR fluff about them;
Horrid hate speech on the platform is completely unmoderated.
W Social is currently showing the limits of free speech absolutism. Its CEO wrote: “We don’t need W to become another echo chamber.”
Reminds you of something?
Atmosphere user @echna.bsky.social astutely remarked that “W Social is on an X speedrun, without ever having been like Twitter.”
🔗: https://mu.social/profile/echna.bsky.social/post/3mtqlknzork2t
Bluesky, #Blacksky, and #Northsky have mechanisms in place to report hate speech - and I am super thankful for that.
As of today, I cannot report to W Social posts by their users that contain hate speech.
The W Social moderation list’s only purpose is to make a distinction between verified users and bots.
Compare it with Blacksky’s moderation list and be amazed (see screenshots).
What’s the big deal about the lack of content moder…