Rule
member since 1 Jun 2023 15:38
Yeah it’s an insane amount of research that gets industry funding, and it’s not always even clarified super well when the funding is more indirect. Like I remember reading this article that stood out to me
He’s an Outspoken Defender of Meat. Industry Funds His Research, Files Show.
There’s of course a lot like that, but it’s worth sharing that I did run into an industry funded study once that actually found the opposite anyway despite that donor pressure
Substituting red meat with high-quality plant protein sources, but not with fish or low-quality carbohydrates, leads to more favorable changes in blood lipids and lipoproteins.
(one of the authors received support from the beef checkoff program, pork checkoff program, national dairy council, and American egg board)
I assume it’s this en.wikipedia.org/…/The_Best_Democracy_Money_Can_B… ? Wikipedia says the author was Greg Palast
Thanks, that did the trick. Ears worked that time
Sorry my ears weren’t working when I read that, can you try sending it again? Like the validation part specifically, you know /s
Thank you, thank you. I tried really hard by typing out the first thought in my head
Glad to hear it’s appreciated! But also, you can be the change you want to see in the world and you too can post stuff like this!
(~Or~ ~do~ ~that~ ~whole~ ~“touch~ ~grass”~ ~thing~ ~and~ ~make~ ~change~ ~by~ ~talking~ ~to~ ~people~ ~and~ ~all~ ~that~)
I know you’re joking, but the literal part of me wants to answer with: Only in that it’s not technically from the onion. It is a satire article which I presume are banned on not the onion
Hell yeah!