British man deported from Sweden despite living there since childhood
the Guardian
British man deported from Sweden despite living there since childhood
John Sellers, 34, who moved with his family to Sweden aged 10, has been ejected despite his recent marriage to a Swede
What a load of cope on The Gaurdian’s part, trying to blame this shit on Sweden instead of the UK.
Examples:
Yeah, “only” more than a third of the total, so rare and weird!
As if Sweden shouldn’t be allowed to do that, even though the UK insisted on being considered separate and foreign.
Blaming Sweden for British immigrants’ own failures.
Sucks for the individuals involved (which I sure hope voted against Brexit, as that’s the only thing that stops it from being a !leopardsatemyface situation), but the UK is getting exactly what it demanded.
At the end of the day, your immigration policies suck when you can kick out someone who lived there for 24 years, fully integrated.
Well it actually starts before that, how can someone live in another country for 24 years and not claim citizenship?
And yes Brits living in another country should be able to read up on what they have to do after Brexit.
It’s not like that Brexit never hit the media.
Why is everyone today calling for someone else to manage their own life?!
Get your shit together.
They must have managed their life quite well considering they were no citizen.
You know that’s an interesting thought there. If you’ve lived in a certain place for at least 10 years, I almost think that you should be forced to renounce citizenship of your prior country and become a citizen there or you’re basically just a long term squatter.
Long-term squatter here, applying for citizenship is expensive (almost 2 grand) and it’s a bloody awful process. It involves taking a test that I’m sure the vast majority of actual citizens would fail. I’d rather put the money towards a house deposit.
I get that, but consider getting a house deposit requires paperwork and financial testing. Skipping or ignoring that paperwork may not serve getting a house deposit.
But it does seem like the person in the article did their paperwork and still ended up being rejected.
that wasn’t the case in sweden until very recently, no test, no language requirement, not sure about the price but i’m sure it wasn’t that expensive cus there were no language tests or knowledge tests to bump up the fees
they basically gave out citizenships to everyone that had lived in the country for a few years.
basically the only option for him to be denied citizenship is that he committed a crime and got jail time or a suspended sentence, and that’s his fault at that point. maybe get citizenship before commiting serious crime lol
Then I’d argue you’re refusing to integrate and you shouldn’t be there. You’re talking about a house, which means even longer term roots. If you’re going to take advantage of their system, you should become willing to integrate.
Can you truly be fully integrated, if you did not obtain citizenship?
Well the UK left the EU so of course there are consequences. People should have paid more attention. Britain really just wanted to separate and not have any consequences.
I think if I were in his shoes, I would have been asking myself and my country’s embassy some questions. As a EU citizen, I am now required to get myself a travel passport if I want to travel to London for just a weekend, as well as some kind of electronic mini-visa similar to the US Esta thing. Assuming that new (in my eyes absolutely bonkers) post-Brexit restrictions only work one way is pretty silly.
Sweden shouldn’t be allowed to do that, just like Trump shouldn’t be allowed to remove people who’ve been living in the US for 24 years.
Unless The Guardian left some important details involving masked, armed thugs and concentration camps out of the article, what Sweden is doing is nothing like what Trump is doing.
And speaking of things left out of the article, it doesn’t explain why his “three failed attempts to remain in the country” actually failed. It makes me wonder if there’s a good reason for it that we’re not being told. (And that, by the way, also sounds markedly different from the complete lack of due process currently happening in US immigration “courts.”)
So wait, is he being kicked out because Britain voted for Brexit or because of something he did? You’re not even keeping your story straight. In the meantime that they’ve been there for a long time it’s literally the reason that we can’t give land back to the Palestinians or Georgia back to the Cherokees, so as a Native American I’m very interested in why it’s OK now. Kind of seems like this is just yet another instance of the people in charge getting to make the rules no matter what the morality is.
What do you mean, “my story?” I’m not The Guardian! They’re the ones claiming he’s being kicked out because of Brexit while leaving out the reasons why Swedish immigration authorities ruled against him three times.
You literally called it a leopards eating faces situation and said that the UK was getting what they demanded.
The point is they ruled against him 3 times after he had been living there for over two decades.
If he didn’t oppose Brexit.
If brexit doesn’t have anything to do with it then why does that matter?
Do you just lack reading comprehension skills or something? Why do you keep assuming random shit I didn’t say?
Of fucking course Brexit has something to do with it; it’s why he doesn’t have an automatic right to live in Sweden indefinitely. But that is not the same as being the reason his non-automatic application to stay failed three times. Clear now?
I don’t know why you’re so desperate to keep changing the topic, I’m just trying to keep it on what I was originally saying and you’re not so I’m done.
The bottom line for me here is that he shouldn’t have been kicked out regardless, after 24 years no matter what he did he should’ve gone through the Swedish penal system or something like that. Or it’s totally OK to kick people out after they’ve lived there for most of all of their lives and we should stop using that excuse in the other places.
Why if your not a citizen you don’t really have any rights in the country.
I should really get Finnish citizenship, in case Finland or Germany ever leave the EU.
Its not going to happen suddenly (I hope). You should have like 5 years of warnings, then at least 3 years of time to do the application process and perhaps even a few years of grace period if the process takes longer than anticipated.
But yeah, if you live here, should probably get the citizenship, because why not
If you’re a German citizen living in Finland, absolutely!
Who knows how fast there’ll be an AfD government in Germany and you certainly wouldn’t want to be kicked out of Finland / lose your EU freedom of movement just because they think its a great idea to leave the EU.
Really sucks leopards also eat faces of remain voters. But at least they saved a lot of money and grew their economy. Oh wait, they didn’t. cer.eu/…/cost-brexit-ten-years-impact-leaving-cus…
My main question is why he didn’t get Swedish citizenship. I thought this would be another article about someone who just didn’t bother to apply, but he did apply and was rejected:
That leaves me wondering why he was rejected for citizenship. It makes me wonder if it’s something like a criminal history, or living on social benefits or something like that, or if it was just a series of beaurocrats that have a directive to try and get immigration / naturalization numbers down.
We can only hope that the right-wing shitstains currently in power get voted out by a large margin in the upcoming elections
I see The Guardian is still pushing this garbage
Other news. Meanwhile, I’d like to know Farage’s opinion on the matter…
Sweden also has no cash anymore basically. Anyone know how invasive Swish is?
Nice country, but idk
Swish is wonderful. I pay petty much everything with swish these days, just to avoid using Visa or any other US payment system.
I dont ask if it works but how private it is. Cash is nearly completely private. I go to the usual supermarket and get 200€ cash then I spend it however I want, repeat.
That is a very good mix of privacy and convenience. My bank even has some kind of deal to allow free cash retrieval from supermarkets 5 times a month or something
We can already pay securely with instant bank transfer but nobody does that. WERO is some pseudo independent service that involves phone numbers which is something I would very much prefer not to share.
Does swish work on uncertified Android phones? What nasty things does the app do? Does it work on rooted phones? If the bootloader is unlocked? Does it load code dynamically from memory? Does it debug its own code? Does it use Play Integrity with fallback for no support at all, or does it explicitely not use Play integrity because it is useless garbage? Do they officially allow certain free android builds like GrapheneOS?
Those are other important points.
Might be a little more anonymous than Visa, but not as anonymous as cash. The bank will still be able to see where you buy, but probably not what. Swish is like WERO in that it uses your phone number, so yeah, if you get a payment you can see their number.
It probably won’t work on uncertified phones, but also because it uses BankID, the digital-id card everyone uses. If anything, the bank-id is the bigger problem because you basically can’t function in Sweden without one.
Tell me more,is it available across EU? I am moving to Walt and need to get away from Visa and Mastercard.
Sweden only I’m afraid, but there’s also a nordic one called Vipps that works in all (I think) nordic countries.
Would love to have it EU wide though.
Well there is WERO, which is a product from the European payments Initiative (a partnership of european banks). I hope that it will continue to expand. wero-wallet.eu/about
Sadly only in Germany, Belgium and France atm.
[deleted]