According to a report in The Washington Post, the woman alleged that her stepfather used Grok to manipulate a photo taken when she was 11 years old to create more than 7,000 explicit images of her. The woman also said that her stepfather was found dead of suicide two days after the images were uncovered in a law enforcement raid.
Marilyn Monroe singing Happy Birthday Mr. President comes to mind as well.
I don’t know why people want to pin it on party rather than people with power often exploit that power for sexual attraction. It’s a power and control thing, not a party thing.
It’s illegal, in at least three different ways, if that’s what you mean. If you are asking why it’s possible for him to do it, it’s because Elon Musk is a pedophile running a pedophile site with a pedophile-enabling CSAM bot.
Elons response when his csam generator generated deep fakes and csam of kids was " we are looking for the people who did this ". No mother fucker it was you who did this.
As if he had 0 responsibility for the release of the csam generator, and took absolutely no precautions on trying to prevent it from happening. No other major LLM company has this issue, and the amount of negligence is on par with leaving a loaded gun at the playground in a park.
What’s even worse is instead of immediately shutting down the csam generator elon instead made it so only paying members can generate csam. When people complained again that people where still actively generating csam he simply removed that function to be available in the united States or the uk. So now when someone generates csam of your kids you won’t even be aware of it.
Now elon musk is fighting at every instance to fight for his right to be able to generate csam. Including suing states.
Trump says this is legal, and he has pressured states to not make any laws against ai in any shape or form, essentially making it illegal to stop elon musk from making csam.
This is what Ai boosters call a modern marvel and amazing life changing technology.
Maybe Todd Blanche, Trump’s personal lawyer defending him against E Jean Carrol’s rape allegations and helper of Ghislaine Maxwell will pursue justice for such crimes?
Regulatory capture, plus constant FOMO about superintelligence. The current sales pitch for genAI slop is that eventually with enough training data, which also generated through use, a superintelligence will emerge.
Two things, 1. I’m a little confused by all the “she claims” and “alleged” language. I think it would be easy to verify the images exist, in which case the only claims up in the air is who actually created the images, and 2. I feel like if we lived in a healthy society, people would say “wow that’s what these tools are being used for? Then I swear off of them until they can be made safe at a minimum.” The degree to which people just dgaf will never not be shocking to me, but they especially dgaf what happens to women and children
In America, legally you are innocent until proven guilty in court. Therefore, news organizations need to leave in this ambiguity to avoid any slander or libel suits, especially if it turns out to be a false accusation
Right, so they can say “over 7,000 child abuse images of her were created, allegedly by her step father” but they don’t. They make it sound like her entire claim is in doubt.
The dude committed suicide two days after the cops raided him. So at most, it would be his estate suing people for libel/slander. But you usually need to prove damages (like losing your job, or being forced to move) to win a slander lawsuit, and it’s hard to claim that a dead guy was monetarily damaged by someone saying things about him.
I don’t use AI, so I guess I’m the person you wish existed?
But this is already against numerous laws, Elon is a felon in multiple countries because of Grok’s paid csam generation, it’s an illegal business model.
The rich have successfully diverged from the legal system.
Yep, and Elon Musk faces legal trouble in EU countries like France. As our country collapses, he may become unable to shield himself from the consequences of his crimes.
I definitely didn’t mean that I wish there was just one individual person who swore off AI haha I’m definitely aware that is a thing, but I’m glad to hear it anyway
It’s almost as if the age checking capabilities of AI is non-existent. If someone needs to have their age verified to view a social media site how can that same technology not be used to catch csam ?
Oh wait it’s because it doesn’t actually work, and it’s just been a bunch of Indian guys in a call center this entire time.
Jesus fucking christ.
I’m sure Grok can make that, too
“the spider caught himself a couple of flies. Hey Zeus, bring out the gimp.”
Despite being nailed to the cross, I just realized I’ve never thought of Jesus and bdsm in the same thought process until now.
Jesus being readied for the cross by the sinful woman seems kinda 4-6th century 50 Shades of Hyssop and worth a peek, Jacob of Serugh & co.
Trumpest fucking Trump.
Error: Human in image appears far too old for Grok’s ChildRapify feature. Try again with an image of a human under 15 years old.
Not the worst possible ending at least.
The suicide probably makes it even more difficult for his family. Poor girl probably blames herself. (She shouldn’t to be clear but still)
Grief and guilt have a nasty way of overriding reason and nuance. I hope she finds a way to a healthier future.
More of this please
Well, at least one problem took care of itself. Now to kill the Grok.
How is this not banned?
In the US, sexual abusers have their own political party now.
Now? Pretty sure abusing women is part and parcel to US governance for most of it’s fucking history.
Yeah this is not a party thing, Clinton and most of his administration were Epstein clients.
Releasing the Epstein files used to be a Republican policy position.
Marilyn Monroe singing Happy Birthday Mr. President comes to mind as well.
I don’t know why people want to pin it on party rather than people with power often exploit that power for sexual attraction. It’s a power and control thing, not a party thing.
Because generally the Dems kick people out of the party for that kind of thing.
The Republicans circle the wagons.
You could have fooled me with all the establishment democrats backing Andrew Cuomo (a sex pest) over Zohran Mamdani.
Really, though? Or just the couple that got headlines?
It’s illegal, in at least three different ways, if that’s what you mean. If you are asking why it’s possible for him to do it, it’s because Elon Musk is a pedophile running a pedophile site with a pedophile-enabling CSAM bot.
Elons response when his csam generator generated deep fakes and csam of kids was " we are looking for the people who did this ". No mother fucker it was you who did this.
As if he had 0 responsibility for the release of the csam generator, and took absolutely no precautions on trying to prevent it from happening. No other major LLM company has this issue, and the amount of negligence is on par with leaving a loaded gun at the playground in a park.
What’s even worse is instead of immediately shutting down the csam generator elon instead made it so only paying members can generate csam. When people complained again that people where still actively generating csam he simply removed that function to be available in the united States or the uk. So now when someone generates csam of your kids you won’t even be aware of it.
Now elon musk is fighting at every instance to fight for his right to be able to generate csam. Including suing states.
Trump says this is legal, and he has pressured states to not make any laws against ai in any shape or form, essentially making it illegal to stop elon musk from making csam.
This is what Ai boosters call a modern marvel and amazing life changing technology.
Because it became a thing under MAGA, who are pro-pedophilia.
Maybe Todd Blanche, Trump’s personal lawyer defending him against E Jean Carrol’s rape allegations and helper of Ghislaine Maxwell will pursue justice for such crimes?
Regulatory capture, plus constant FOMO about superintelligence. The current sales pitch for genAI slop is that eventually with enough training data, which also generated through use, a superintelligence will emerge.
It is in Minnesota
Not shocking. Elon’s company sued a state over banning the use of AI to make CSAM.
Thats fucking disgusting
Two things, 1. I’m a little confused by all the “she claims” and “alleged” language. I think it would be easy to verify the images exist, in which case the only claims up in the air is who actually created the images, and 2. I feel like if we lived in a healthy society, people would say “wow that’s what these tools are being used for? Then I swear off of them until they can be made safe at a minimum.” The degree to which people just dgaf will never not be shocking to me, but they especially dgaf what happens to women and children
In America, legally you are innocent until proven guilty in court. Therefore, news organizations need to leave in this ambiguity to avoid any slander or libel suits, especially if it turns out to be a false accusation
Unless youre not white. Then its guilty until proven innocent.
Right, so they can say “over 7,000 child abuse images of her were created, allegedly by her step father” but they don’t. They make it sound like her entire claim is in doubt.
The dude committed suicide two days after the cops raided him. So at most, it would be his estate suing people for libel/slander. But you usually need to prove damages (like losing your job, or being forced to move) to win a slander lawsuit, and it’s hard to claim that a dead guy was monetarily damaged by someone saying things about him.
Well a newspapers lawyer will be very upset if you give anyone any legal opening to sue
I don’t use AI, so I guess I’m the person you wish existed?
But this is already against numerous laws, Elon is a felon in multiple countries because of Grok’s paid csam generation, it’s an illegal business model.
The rich have successfully diverged from the legal system.
Yep, and Elon Musk faces legal trouble in EU countries like France. As our country collapses, he may become unable to shield himself from the consequences of his crimes.
The UK had a prime minister who made his reputation as a prosecutor. He didn’t do shiiiiit about grok.
Politicians work for money, and it’s an open auction.
The UK is no longer an EU country.
I definitely didn’t mean that I wish there was just one individual person who swore off AI haha I’m definitely aware that is a thing, but I’m glad to hear it anyway
It’s almost as if the age checking capabilities of AI is non-existent. If someone needs to have their age verified to view a social media site how can that same technology not be used to catch csam ?
Oh wait it’s because it doesn’t actually work, and it’s just been a bunch of Indian guys in a call center this entire time.